1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(97)00084-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal development of arm posture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…30,34 With MR imaging providing a fuller appreciation of the intrauterine environment, we observed that the fetal posture appears to facilitate the adduction of the arms toward the midline and the flexion of the hands toward the face across the age range studied (Fig 3A,-B). It is difficult to quantify the effect that the shape of the uterus has on determining this posture, though coronal sections through the fetal body show that from GA 20 weeks, there is negligible amniotic fluid on its lateral aspects (Fig 3A), with collections located mostly anterior and posterior to the fetus (Fig 3B).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…30,34 With MR imaging providing a fuller appreciation of the intrauterine environment, we observed that the fetal posture appears to facilitate the adduction of the arms toward the midline and the flexion of the hands toward the face across the age range studied (Fig 3A,-B). It is difficult to quantify the effect that the shape of the uterus has on determining this posture, though coronal sections through the fetal body show that from GA 20 weeks, there is negligible amniotic fluid on its lateral aspects (Fig 3A), with collections located mostly anterior and posterior to the fetus (Fig 3B).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast to previous studies on fetal laterality (Ververs, van Gelder-Hasker, de Vries, Hopkins & van Geijn 1998;Hepper, Shahidullah & White 1991), our coding scheme used continuous recording of fetal movements. Ten minutes of segments of the 60 scans, in which the fetal face as well as a hand were visible was selected and coded frame by frame and analysed in terms of frequency of occurrence of self-touch.…”
Section: Methods Of Coding Fetal Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researchers coded left and right arm movements and did not detect any differences in the frequency of right or left movements. Ververs, van Gelder-Hasker, de Vries, Hopkins & van Geijn, 1998) videotaped 2-D scans of 10 fetuses from 12-38 weeks gestation every 4 weeks. Scoring the movements of one fetal arm every 30 seconds they did not find any significant differences between frequencies of right or left arm movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, fetal facial touch does not seem impeded with increasing gestational age given that research indicates that fetuses at 24 weeks gestational age have their elbows flexed 93% of the time observed (Ververs, Van Gelder-Hasker, De Vries, Hopkins, Van Geijn, 1998), increasing further at 36 weeks. Hence, elbow flexion which might be considered to be conducive to face touch is not related to fetal age.…”
Section: Developmental Psychobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%