2021
DOI: 10.1177/08903344211008797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal Provider Breastfeeding Toolkit: Results of a Pilot to Increase Women’s Prenatal Breastfeeding Support, Intentions, and Outcomes

Abstract: Background Breastfeeding rates for United States women with lower incomes fall below the government’s Healthy People 2020 Goals. Breastfeeding recommendations combined with support from providers and peer counselors help women decide to begin and sustain breastfeeding, but peer counselor uptake is low. Research Aim To evaluate changes in referrals to Women, Infants, and Children’s Supplemental Nutrition Program peer counselors, reported prenatal provider education and support, and breastfeeding outcomes (inten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maternal intention to breastfeed for six months or more was found to lower the risk of ceasing EBF, aligning with prior research indicating that intending EBF increases its duration [16,20]. In contrast, a US cohort study revealed that although more participants in the post-intervention group expressed intentions for any BF and aimed for a year or longer compared to the pre-intervention group, no signi cant difference was found in EBF rates between the two cohorts [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Maternal intention to breastfeed for six months or more was found to lower the risk of ceasing EBF, aligning with prior research indicating that intending EBF increases its duration [16,20]. In contrast, a US cohort study revealed that although more participants in the post-intervention group expressed intentions for any BF and aimed for a year or longer compared to the pre-intervention group, no signi cant difference was found in EBF rates between the two cohorts [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%