2019
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal ultrasound findings of rasopathies in a cohort of 424 fetuses: update on genetic testing in the NGS era

Abstract: BackgroundThis study evaluates 6 years of prenatal rasopathy testing in the Netherlands, updates on previous data and gives recommendations for prenatal rasopathy testing.Methods424 fetal samples, sent in for prenatal rasopathy testing in 2011–2016, were collected. Cohort 1 included 231 samples that were sequenced for 1–5 rasopathy genes. Cohort 2 included 193 samples that were analysed with a 14-gene next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. For all mutation-positive samples in both cohorts, the referring physi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
51
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study confirms the strong association between nuchal fluid accumulation and RASopathies, of which Noonan syndrome is the most common . This group represented 52% of the single gene disorders diagnosed in the cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study confirms the strong association between nuchal fluid accumulation and RASopathies, of which Noonan syndrome is the most common . This group represented 52% of the single gene disorders diagnosed in the cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Of note is that all the fetuses with RASopathies had all NT larger than 3.1 mm. in a recent study RASopathy analysis is recommended in all cases of NT ≥5mm, even in the absence of additional markers …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An active area of research for our group is reviewing the literature to identify an optimal NT value for making a diagnosis of RD. We read the article of Stuurman et al with particular interest given the large size of their study cohort 6 . The suggestion of using two different NT cut-offs based on the presence of ultrasound findings is interesting and certainly requires further review.…”
Section: Replymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read the article of Stuurman et al . with particular interest given the large size of their study cohort. The suggestion of using two different NT cut‐offs based on the presence of ultrasound findings is interesting and certainly requires further review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this report, all three RD‐positive cases had severe fetal ultrasound findings that would have likely resulted in a lethal outcome, comprising one case each of hypoplastic left ventricle, double‐outlet single ventricle and hydrops. A recent study evaluated prenatal ultrasound findings of RD in a cohort of 424 fetuses over a period of 6 years, and concluded that RD testing is recommended when the fetus shows isolated increased NT ≥ 5.0 mm or when NT ≥ 3.5 mm and at least one of the following ultrasound anomalies are present: distended jugular lymphatic sacs, hydrops fetalis, polyhydramnios, pleural effusion, ascites, cardiac defect and renal anomaly. Conversely, the detection rate of RD disorders is low (1.1% (1/93)) in fetuses with isolated first‐trimester increased NT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%