2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatally versus postnatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia – Side, stage, and outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, while the majority were prenatally diagnosed by ultrasound and were asymptomatic at birth, one-third were still initially diagnosed in the postnatal period in spite of the widespread availability and enhanced resolution of ultrasound technologies. This prenatal diagnosis rate is comparable to that recently reported for congenital diaphragmatic hernia [42]. Nevertheless, the true CLM prenatal diagnosis rate may be slightly higher given that some member institutions without well-established fetal care programs may have had difficulty accessing outside hospital maternal records.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Second, while the majority were prenatally diagnosed by ultrasound and were asymptomatic at birth, one-third were still initially diagnosed in the postnatal period in spite of the widespread availability and enhanced resolution of ultrasound technologies. This prenatal diagnosis rate is comparable to that recently reported for congenital diaphragmatic hernia [42]. Nevertheless, the true CLM prenatal diagnosis rate may be slightly higher given that some member institutions without well-established fetal care programs may have had difficulty accessing outside hospital maternal records.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The most recent study from the CDHSG on 3,746 cases of CDH managed between 2007 and 2015 has shown that the need for ECMO in this cohort of patients was 29%. 22 The low use of ECMO in our study could be explained by different factors. As the NSQIP database records the use of ECMO only in the 7 days prior to surgery, a proportion of patients may have not been captured.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Para o diagnóstico diferencial da apresentação tardia, os exames de imagem tornam-se importantes, tal qual no caso exposto, que teve como hipóteses iniciais a broncopneumonia ou aspiração de corpo estranho, sobretudo a radiografia contrastada e a tomografia de tórax, pois complementam o estudo de uma condição menos comum. 12 De acordo com os dados de Bagłaj, 13 a precisão diagnóstica com a radiografia de tórax chega a 49% e o encontro de alças intestinais com ar, por vezes com níveis hidroaéreos e desvio do mediastino, são sinais típicos de HDC ao raio X. 13,14 a origem costal e esternal do diafragma e representam apenas 1 a 2% das HDC.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified