2019
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Assessment of Muscle Mass Using Computerized Tomography Scans to Predict Outcomes Following Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Abstract: Background. Sarcopenia is an established risk factor predicting survival in chronically ill and trauma patients. We herein examine the assessment and clinical implication of sarcopenia in liver transplantation (LT). Methods. Computerized tomography scans from 172 patients waitlisted for LT were analyzed by applying 6 morphometric muscle scores, including 2 density indices (psoas density [PD] and skeletal muscle density [SMD]) and 4 scores based on muscle area (total psoas area, psoas muscle index, skeletal mus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique also provides data on the mean skeletal muscle radiodensity, quoted in Hounsfield Units (HU), which is a surrogate marker of muscle quality and an indication of the presence of myosteatosis, as well as adiposity in terms of both visceral and subcutaneous fat cross-sectional area and indices. There is a large volume of literature linking preoperative sarcopenia in a range of different pathologies, including pancreatic surgery [27], gastric cancer surgery [28], esophageal cancer [29], liver transplantation [30] and colorectal cancer [31] to worsened clinical outcomes and overall survival. The strength of this relationship is even greater when the presence of sarcopenia is combined with obesity, i.e.…”
Section: Sarcopeniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique also provides data on the mean skeletal muscle radiodensity, quoted in Hounsfield Units (HU), which is a surrogate marker of muscle quality and an indication of the presence of myosteatosis, as well as adiposity in terms of both visceral and subcutaneous fat cross-sectional area and indices. There is a large volume of literature linking preoperative sarcopenia in a range of different pathologies, including pancreatic surgery [27], gastric cancer surgery [28], esophageal cancer [29], liver transplantation [30] and colorectal cancer [31] to worsened clinical outcomes and overall survival. The strength of this relationship is even greater when the presence of sarcopenia is combined with obesity, i.e.…”
Section: Sarcopeniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…prevalence of sarcopenia from cross-sectional CT images in adults on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) ranges between 40% and 70%. (2,7,8) Sarcopenia in adults is associated with increased wait-list morbidity and mortality caused by sepsis and infections (9) and impaired posttransplant outcomes, including decreased patient survival, (1,2,(10)(11)(12) increased serious infection, (11,(13)(14)(15)(16) prolonged intubation (11,17) with longer duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, (11,17,18) longer overall hospitalization, (11,19) rejection, (20) graft survival, (21) and postoperative complications. (14,18,22,23) Sarcopenia contributes to impaired growth and outcomes in pediatric chronic conditions, such as leukemia, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic liver/intestinal failure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, samples were immediately transferred to Allprotect Tissue Reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Deceased donor LT was performed according to previously described techniques ( 10 ). Triple immunosuppression regimen was implemented as described earlier ( 10 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deceased donor LT was performed according to previously described techniques ( 10 ). Triple immunosuppression regimen was implemented as described earlier ( 10 ). The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (UN5054, 324/4.13) and all experiments were conducted in compliance with the Declarations of Helsinki and Istanbul.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%