2014
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative diagnosis and staging of rectal cancer using diffusion-weighted and water imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced scanning

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and water imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced scanning for the preoperative diagnosis and staging of rectal cancer. In total, 72 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal cancer were selected for examination using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with phased-array coils, DWI, water imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced scanning. The patients were divided into two groups, experimental (simple enhanced scan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies reported significantly higher ADC values (indicating a lower cellular density) for benign nodes than for malignant nodes. [28][29][30][31] Sensitivities and specificities to characterize nodes based on the ADC (using retrospectively determined threshold values) ranged from 67 to 88% and 60 to 97% respectively, which is only slightly higher than previously reported values for morphological MRI. 21,22,24,32 Moreover, reported ADC values vary across studies (using different MR vendors and protocols) and show considerable overlap between malignant and benign nodes.…”
Section: Lymph Node Stagingmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies reported significantly higher ADC values (indicating a lower cellular density) for benign nodes than for malignant nodes. [28][29][30][31] Sensitivities and specificities to characterize nodes based on the ADC (using retrospectively determined threshold values) ranged from 67 to 88% and 60 to 97% respectively, which is only slightly higher than previously reported values for morphological MRI. 21,22,24,32 Moreover, reported ADC values vary across studies (using different MR vendors and protocols) and show considerable overlap between malignant and benign nodes.…”
Section: Lymph Node Stagingmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The majority of studies on DWI for characterizing rectal nodes focused on quantitatively measuring nodal ADC values. 23,[28][29][30][31] An overview of these studies is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Lymph Node Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of MRI for lymph node metastasis are 77 and 71%, respectively [ 12 ]. Additionally, the usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-MRI has recently been reported [ 13 15 ]. The accuracy of DWI-MRI is better than that of both CT and 18 FDG-PET (86.6 vs. 76.0% and 78.3 vs. 69.9%, respectively) [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches to the assessment of tumour response using MRI have been described. These include morphological changes assessed in terms of MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG) and volumetry, or functional changes using diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI. Tumour volume is a strong predictor of tumour response and outcome, especially when combined with DWI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%