2021
DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Eccentric Aortic Regurgitation and Outcomes Following Valve-Sparing Root Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All standard 2D (2-dimensional) views for AV should first be used, carefully inspecting for calcifications, fenestrations, perforations, free margin elongation, or prominence. 10 In our case, as the eccentric jet was in the…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All standard 2D (2-dimensional) views for AV should first be used, carefully inspecting for calcifications, fenestrations, perforations, free margin elongation, or prominence. 10 In our case, as the eccentric jet was in the…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Eccentric AI can be multifactorial, often related to asymmetry involving 1 or more cusps or abnormal aortic root geometry. 10 Park et al 11 concluded in their comparison of eccentric versus central AI that in patients with TV AVs associated with eccentric AI, 63% of the valves demonstrated asymmetry. Arora and Maddali 12 described a case of a localized eccentric AI jet secondary to AV intercusp size discrepancy with a resultant coaptation defect, which mimicked a cusp perforation or fenestration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When examining the impact of preoperative jet centricity in patients with >2+ preoperative AI, preoperative eccentric AI did not negatively impact operative outcomes when compared to preoperative central AI (30 d mortality 0% vs. 4%, eccentric vs. concentric, P=0.64). When comparing long-term outcomes, ten-year cumulative incidence of aortic valve replacement (AVR) (93% vs. 100%, P=0.98) and ten-year freedom from >1+ AI (15% vs. 0%, P=0.97) were similar between patients with preoperative eccentric AI compared to those with preoperative central AI ( 10 ).…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%