2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.08.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Evaluation of Living Kidney Donors With Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reports of fibromuscular dysplasia in potential donors identified a prevalence of 3.8% to 4.4% using conventional angiography, with 75% being women (27,28), compared with the 2.7% prevalence by CT angiography in our study (with 81% being women). The 0.6% prevalence of renal artery dilation in our study compares with 1.3% in another study of potential kidney donors (29).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Other reports of fibromuscular dysplasia in potential donors identified a prevalence of 3.8% to 4.4% using conventional angiography, with 75% being women (27,28), compared with the 2.7% prevalence by CT angiography in our study (with 81% being women). The 0.6% prevalence of renal artery dilation in our study compares with 1.3% in another study of potential kidney donors (29).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Multi-detector CT Angiography and Urography (MDCTA/CTU) has replaced conventional angiography for assessment of renal vascular anatomy prior to living donor nephrectomy 1,2 . These studies may image the lung bases, abdomen and pelvis and thus have the potential to detect a wide variety of clinically occult abnormalities which may affect kidney donation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the impact of individual differences and the increased radiation dose caused by repeated scanning, the bolus tracking method is more frequently used at present. Various reports provide greatly different trigger threshold settings, which ranges from 50 to 200 HU; moreover, there is no detailed description of the effect of different threshold values on the observation of target vessels (Namasivayam et al, 2006;Chai et al, 2008;Petridis et al, 2008;Zamboni et al, 2010). It should be noted that with the increase of the threshold value, the renal vein gradually becomes more obviously developed in the arterial phase scan, which affects the observation of renal arteries, especially the tiny branches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%