1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(98)00991-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative evaluation of potential living donors for liver transplantation: the role of helical computed tomography-angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the spatial resolution of MRI for the evaluation of hepatic arterial anatomy remains inferior to that of DSA, MRA has, in our experience, proven to be an accurate preoperative test for the definition of the portal and hepatic venous anatomy. Several studies have found that CT or MRI can show the anatomy of the hepatic vasculature of a liver donor before transplantation [23][24][25]. Winter et al [23] and Chan et al [24] showed that in liver transplantation candidates, successful 3D CT arteriography was as accurate as catheter angiography for assessing hepatic arterial anatomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the spatial resolution of MRI for the evaluation of hepatic arterial anatomy remains inferior to that of DSA, MRA has, in our experience, proven to be an accurate preoperative test for the definition of the portal and hepatic venous anatomy. Several studies have found that CT or MRI can show the anatomy of the hepatic vasculature of a liver donor before transplantation [23][24][25]. Winter et al [23] and Chan et al [24] showed that in liver transplantation candidates, successful 3D CT arteriography was as accurate as catheter angiography for assessing hepatic arterial anatomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have found that CT or MRI can show the anatomy of the hepatic vasculature of a liver donor before transplantation [23][24][25]. Winter et al [23] and Chan et al [24] showed that in liver transplantation candidates, successful 3D CT arteriography was as accurate as catheter angiography for assessing hepatic arterial anatomy. Although the risk of radiation exposure and of a reaction to iodinated contrast material is probably low enough to justify the use of CT for the evaluation of the hepatic vasculature of a living liver donor, the superior safety profile of gadolinium-based agents compared with that of the iodinated contrast agents must be considered one merit of MRI [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about the origin and number of arteries that supply the liver and the presence of any variant anatomy is needed. In these patients, left portal vein resection proximal to the origin of the anterior portal vein would compromise portal perfusion to segments IV, V, and VIII, resulting in segmental ischemia and subsequent atrophy [13][14][15][16]18]. Likewise, in patients considered for an intraarterial chemotherapy pump for liver metastasis, hepatic artery mapping is a prerequisite for accurate placement of the pump [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, and if no contra-indication is present, the preferred modality for the pre-simulation imaging should be angio-CT. Both modalities do offer correct visualization of the liver arterial vasculature [39] but only angio-CT permit to depict the tumor arterial vasculature almost as precisely as the DSA (Figure 3 are produced using iodinated contrast medium by subtracting a 'precontrast image' (mask) from later images, once the contrast medium has been introduced into a structure.…”
Section: Sirt Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%