Measurements of arterial blood gases are important in studies of ventilatory control during exercise and can give valuable information about the effi ciency of ventilation and gas exchange. To avoid the invasive procedure of placing arterial catheters for sampling arterial blood, partial pressure of end-tidal CO 2 (P etco 2 ) has been used as a noninvasive method to estimate Pa co 2 in young, healthy adults at rest and during exercise. [1][2][3][4] These studies have concluded that, although P etco 2 may slightly underestimate Pa co 2 at rest, P etco 2 is a good index of Pa co 2 during resting conditions. During exercise, the instantaneous P aco 2 fl uctuates cyclically with breathing, 5 and the P etco 2 is higher than the average P aco 2 over the complete breathing cycle. 6 Therefore, P etco 2 may overestimate Pa co 2 during exercise, when CO 2 production, ventilation, and tidal volume (V t ) are all increased. 7 To circumvent this problem, Jones et al 3 developed a regression equation to predict Pa co 2 from P etco 2 (P jco 2 ) and V t that corrects for the overestimation of Pa co 2 by P etco 2 :J 2 E T 2 T P CO 5.5 0.9 P CO 2.1 V (Equation 1) where V t is in liters.Background: Obesity affects lung function and gas exchange and imposes mechanical ventilatory limitations during exercise that could disrupt the predictability of Pa CO 2 from end-tidal P CO 2 (P ETCO 2 ), an important clinical tool for assessing gas exchange effi ciency during exercise testing. Pa CO 2 has been estimated during exercise with good accuracy in normal-weight individuals by using a correction equation developed by Jones and colleagues (P JCO 2 5 5.5 1 0.9 3 P ETCO 2 -2.1 3 tidal volume). The purpose of this project was to determine the accuracy of Pa CO 2 estimations from P ETCO 2 and P JCO 2 values at rest and at submaximal and peak exercise in morbidly obese adults. Methods: Pa CO 2 and P ETCO 2 values from 37 obese adults (22 women, 15 men; age, 39 Ϯ 9 y; BMI, 49 Ϯ 7; [mean Ϯ SD]) were evaluated. Subjects underwent ramped cardiopulmonary exercise testing to volitional exhaustion. P ETCO 2 was determined from expired gases simultaneously with temperature-corrected arterial blood gases (radial arterial catheter) at rest, every minute during exercise, and at peak exercise. Data were analyzed using paired t tests. Results: P ETCO 2 was not signifi cantly different from Pa CO 2 at rest (P ETCO 2 5 37 Ϯ 3 mm Hg vs Pa CO 2 5 38 Ϯ 3 mm Hg, P 5 .14). However, during exercise, P ETCO 2 was signifi cantly higher than Pa CO 2 (submaximal: 42 Ϯ 4 vs 40 Ϯ 3, P , .001; peak: 40 Ϯ 4 vs 37 Ϯ 4, P , .001, respectively). Jones' equation successfully corrected P ETCO 2 , such that P JCO 2 was not signifi cantly different from Pa CO 2 (submax: P JCO 2 5 40 Ϯ 3, P 5 .650; peak: 37 Ϯ 4, P 5 .065). Conclusion: P JCO 2 provides a better estimate of Pa CO 2 than P ETCO 2 during submaximal exercise and at peak exercise, whereas at rest both yield reasonable estimates in morbidly obese individuals. Clinicians and physiologists can obtain accurate estimations ...