2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative multimodality imaging of pectus excavatum: State of the art review and call for standardization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 In contrast, other reports found no association between cross‐sectional indices and cardiac function. 13 , 33 In our study, an association between the preoperative cross‐sectional imaging anatomic parameters and the improvement in VO 2 max was not detected, probably as a result of the wide heterogeneity of PE malformations (including differences in the depth of the depression, location of the site of maximum depression, and severity of heart displacement) 34 which may contribute to the inability of standard imaging indices to consistently capture the severity of the adverse physiological impact of PE. Based on our data, we suggest that the approach to assessment of PE severity should not be based on a single diagnostic test or parameter, which clearly carries implications given that specific anatomical parameters, such as HI, are used as criteria for surgical intervention insurance coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“… 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 In contrast, other reports found no association between cross‐sectional indices and cardiac function. 13 , 33 In our study, an association between the preoperative cross‐sectional imaging anatomic parameters and the improvement in VO 2 max was not detected, probably as a result of the wide heterogeneity of PE malformations (including differences in the depth of the depression, location of the site of maximum depression, and severity of heart displacement) 34 which may contribute to the inability of standard imaging indices to consistently capture the severity of the adverse physiological impact of PE. Based on our data, we suggest that the approach to assessment of PE severity should not be based on a single diagnostic test or parameter, which clearly carries implications given that specific anatomical parameters, such as HI, are used as criteria for surgical intervention insurance coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Stress echocardiography may reveal important circulatory changes which are not present at rest. 11 Postural echocardiography may be of value as it has been described that compromise of the right ventricular outflow tract in pectus excavatum is exacerbated in a sitting upright, 9 or sitting and forward bending position, 12 which was likely relevant in our patient as well. Cardiac MRI may be performed during end expiration, as the degree of cardiac compression worsens with expiration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…There have been many studies regarding utilities of automated densitometric analysis by quantitative CT in adults [ 9 - 12 ]. However, only a few studies have been published including the use of an automated quantitative densitometric CT analysis in the paediatric age group [ 17 - 19 ]. Our study is the first article to calculate the lung parenchyma density by automated quantitative CT in children with PE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chest CT allows determination of several thoracic indexes to assess the severity of the chest wall deformity and to guide surgical strategies [ 19 ]. Although the degree of chest wall deformity is estimated objectively by the Haller index and correction index, the Haller index is commonly used to establish surgical candidacy [ 19 ]. Normal mean values of the Haller index are described as less than 2.5 [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%