2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.665240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis Risk in Breast Cancer: A Potential Application on Omitting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Abstract: BackgroundSentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is feasible for breast cancer (BC) patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes; however, complications develop in some patients after surgery, although SLN metastasis is rarely found. Previous predictive models contained parameters that relied on postoperative data, thus limiting their application in the preoperative setting. Therefore, it is necessary to find a new model for preoperative risk prediction for SLN metastasis to help clinicians facilitate indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many nomograms and ANN models have been developed for predicting nodal metastasis, or the lack thereof, with [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] or without imaging [37][38][39][40]. The discrimination of clinical nomograms including clinicopathological data only is equivalent to the predictions made by the NILS prediction model (area under the curve (AUC) 0.73-0.75 [39,40]), whereas those incorporating radiomic features present an AUC slightly above 0.90 [30][31][32]34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many nomograms and ANN models have been developed for predicting nodal metastasis, or the lack thereof, with [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] or without imaging [37][38][39][40]. The discrimination of clinical nomograms including clinicopathological data only is equivalent to the predictions made by the NILS prediction model (area under the curve (AUC) 0.73-0.75 [39,40]), whereas those incorporating radiomic features present an AUC slightly above 0.90 [30][31][32]34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many nomograms and ANN models have been developed for predicting nodal metastasis, or the lack thereof, with [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] or without imaging [37][38][39][40]. The discrimination of clinical nomograms including clinicopathological data only is equivalent to the predictions made by the NILS prediction model (area under the curve (AUC) 0.73-0.75 [39,40]), whereas those incorporating radiomic features present an AUC slightly above 0.90 [30][31][32]34]. However, the ANN model that this study aims to validate is a promising tool in the clinic because the input variables are routinely available, no extra imaging besides clinical work-up (i.e., mammography and axillary ultrasound) is necessary, and the web interface is user-friendly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported that tumor size was an independent prognostic factor of SLN [ 32 ]. Tumor size was proportional to axillary lymph node metastasis, and each 0.1 cm higher in tumor size resulted in 4.29 times more likely to have SLN metastasis in breast cancer [ 33 ]. Our study showed that the lesion size was the largest for the number of metastatic ALNs of > 3, followed by the number of metastatic ALNs of 1–2, and then by no metastasis, similar to previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al. concluded that a significant association between young age, high BMI, high Ki67 and large tumour size was an independent predictor for ALNM ( 25 ). However, the accuracy of the above studies remains uncertain due to insufficient population size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng et al found that grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her-2) status were significantly correlated with ALNM (24). Hu et al concluded that a significant association between young age, high BMI, high Ki67 and large tumour size was an independent predictor for ALNM (25). However, the accuracy of the above studies remains uncertain due to insufficient population size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%