“…For EVAR election and evaluation of anatomical parameters, CTA remains the standard of reference; however, in the literature, some studies have proposed to run the planning using NC-MRI in relation to the radiation dose saving and preservation of renal function. 6,7 Our study, compared with the other papers published in the literature, 6,7 confirms not only the interobserver agreement of NC-MRI measurements but also their agreement with those provided by CTA: Interobserver ICCs for CTA and NC-MRI showed average values of 0.92 and 0.91 and intermodality ICCs for observer 1 and 2 showed average values of 0.92 and 0.92. We did not observe important differences in lengths, diameters, and angle measurements, except for both external iliac vessel diameters (Tables 1 and 2).…”