2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01474.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative risk analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

Abstract: Patients with SCC and AC of the oesophagus differed regarding their socioeconomic and preoperative risk factors for surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
73
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The different expression of MMP in both histopatlogical types of EC may be the result of marked differences in the pathogenesis, tumor location, tumor biology of adenocarcinoma of esophagus and squamous cell carcinoma [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different expression of MMP in both histopatlogical types of EC may be the result of marked differences in the pathogenesis, tumor location, tumor biology of adenocarcinoma of esophagus and squamous cell carcinoma [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-nine consecutive patients (median age, 60 years; age range, 29 -72 years; gender, 30 men and 9 women) with locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancers (c T2-4 , N x , M 0 ) in good general health with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 -1 and normal to moderate risk factors for esophageal surgery (14) were offered standardized neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Clinical staging was based on a barium swallow, endoscopic ultrasound, and computed tomography of chest and abdomen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the largest series was published by Luketich et al [9]. They showed their outcomes in 222 patients after MIE: 30-day operative mortality of 1.4%, median intensive care unit stay of 1 day (range 1-3), hospital stay of 7 days (range 3-75), lower incidence of pneumonia, and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (7.6 and 5%, respectively); anastomotic leak rate of 11.7%; and excellent health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores at a mean follow-up of 19 These indings have been conirmed in a recent meta-analysis [13] of 57 studies containing 15,790 patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Less intraoperative blood loss, short hospital stay, reduction of the incidence of total and pulmonary complications (OR: 0.700, 95% CI 0.626-0.781 and OR: 0.527, 95% CI: 0.431-0.645, p < 0.05, respectively), and high operative time than Open esophagectomy were found.…”
Section: Diferent Groups Have Reported Their Experience In Implementamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, we must know which indicators can increase postoperative morbidity and mortality. Many risk factors have been identiied: Karnofsky score less than 80, liver cirrhosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ischemic heart disease, advanced age, locally advanced tumor, active smoking, alcoholism, and malnutrition [16][17][18][19] are some of them. Evaluating individual risk is important for patient selection and a proper preoperative management, regardless of the surgical approach to be performed (MIE or open surgery).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Physiological Reservementioning
confidence: 99%