2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-368683/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Risk-Stratification of Pediatric Malignant Brainstem Glioma based on a validated nomogram: A SEER based Analysis

Abstract: Purpose: Pediatric patients diagnosed with brainstem malignant gliomas (BSMGs) have a poor prognosis. Our study aimed to construct and validate a prognostic nomogram to predict the cancer‐specific survival preoperatively (CSS) rates and then a risk-stratification given to these patients.Methods: From 1998 to 2016, we extracted patients' data from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. A total of 1160 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into training and validating groups. Subsequent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these differences likely reflect true predominance in these population, incidence rates may be biased towards higher reporting in non-Hispanic Whites given previous reports of their greater access to care and earlier diagnosis [31]. It was important to verify discriminatory practices using the C-index and calibration, which was examined by contrasting the compatibility between the theoretical and measured survival of patients [32][33][34][35], to confirm the nomogram and ensure that the algorithm could be deployed broadly and improve the classification accuracy. Compared to the previous staging approach, our nomogram was more effective at discriminating and predicting survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these differences likely reflect true predominance in these population, incidence rates may be biased towards higher reporting in non-Hispanic Whites given previous reports of their greater access to care and earlier diagnosis [31]. It was important to verify discriminatory practices using the C-index and calibration, which was examined by contrasting the compatibility between the theoretical and measured survival of patients [32][33][34][35], to confirm the nomogram and ensure that the algorithm could be deployed broadly and improve the classification accuracy. Compared to the previous staging approach, our nomogram was more effective at discriminating and predicting survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%