2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative staging of liver metastases from uveal melanoma by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)

Abstract: To cite this version:V. Servois, P. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Results: R0 re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An issue in high-risk patients is to detect relapse at the earliest stage after primary tumor treatment. Unfortunately, clinically available methods to assess the extent of the disease such as detection by liver function tests or imaging are generally positive when the metastatic tumor burden is already high (7,8). Indeed, the detection of small lesions remains a real challenge especially for the miliary form of metastases, which is frequent in uveal melanoma (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An issue in high-risk patients is to detect relapse at the earliest stage after primary tumor treatment. Unfortunately, clinically available methods to assess the extent of the disease such as detection by liver function tests or imaging are generally positive when the metastatic tumor burden is already high (7,8). Indeed, the detection of small lesions remains a real challenge especially for the miliary form of metastases, which is frequent in uveal melanoma (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localization of small metastases is also limited by respiratory motion artefacts. 6 In a study by Orcurto et al, 12 only 4% of 108 hepatic lesions were detected by PET alone as compared with 65% by MRI alone.…”
Section: Treated Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, ultrasound of the liver is typically performed every 6 months for 10 years, with CT or MRI being performed if a suspicious lesion is visualized. 6 At tertiary-care centres in the USA, surveillance is usually carried out in a twofold manner, using MRI of the abdomen with i.v. contrast for optimal liver surveillance and CT chest, abdomen and pelvis for whole-body surveillance, with the timing based on the risk of metastasis indicated by the tumour histology and genetic profile.…”
Section: Imaging Of Ocular Melanoma Metastasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computerised tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) are less sensitive and expose patients to radiation. 67,68 18F-FDG PET/CT does not detect metastases from uveal melanoma as sensitively as secondaries from cutaneous melanoma. 69 Screening with magnetic resonance imaging is relatively expensive and uses up scarce healthcare resources.…”
Section: Screening For Metastatic Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%