“…Later, the surface area was determined by means of the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) model, the total pore volume was determined at P/P • 0.99, the micropore volume by the Dubinin-Radushkevich equation (DR), as well as the mesopore volume that was obtained by the difference between the total volume and the micropore, whose values for CS were, respectively: 851 m 2 g −1 , 0.39 cm 3 g −1 , 0.34 cm 3 g −1 , y 0.05 cm 3 g −1 , while for CST they had a slight increase: 934 m 2 g −1 , 0.41 cm 3 g −1 , 0.38 cm 3 g −1 , y 0.03 cm 3 g −1 . This could be generated because selective removal of functional groups could give rise to access to pores that were blocked and widening of porous structures (Nguyen and Bhatia, 2012;Zhou et al, 2018). This removal was related to the thermal stability of the surface groups, since at temperatures higher than 673 K the carboxylic groups are removed, at 923 K the lactonic groups and 973 K the phenolics (Figueiredo et al, 1999), which are the groups that can be evaluated by Boehm titrations and whose results are shown in Figure 5 where a decrease in the content of these functional groups was indeed evidenced, which was corroborated by the pore size distribution (PSD) presented in Figure 3, since the PSD showed higher pore volumes for CST than for CS.…”