2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/180/1/012007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Microcrystalline (MCC) from Fiber of Empty Fruit Bunch Palm Oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…FTIR spectroscopic analysis was carried out to examine the intermolecular hydrogen bonding of the α‐cellulose and ODLA‐grafted α‐cellulose and different composites because it is the most frequently used technique for studying intermolecular and intramolecular interactions in polymers and composites . Figure shows the FTIR spectra of the α‐cellulose, ODLA‐grafted α‐cellulose, LGC‐20 composite, and PLLA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FTIR spectroscopic analysis was carried out to examine the intermolecular hydrogen bonding of the α‐cellulose and ODLA‐grafted α‐cellulose and different composites because it is the most frequently used technique for studying intermolecular and intramolecular interactions in polymers and composites . Figure shows the FTIR spectra of the α‐cellulose, ODLA‐grafted α‐cellulose, LGC‐20 composite, and PLLA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific MW effects were also reported recently, indicating that a molecular level interaction between the MW and cellulose (via the primary alcohol groups, i.e., -CH 2 OH groups) is responsible for transferring the MW energy to their surrounding molecular structure to initiate the cleavage of polysaccharide chains [13]. The cellulose samples used in the hydrolysis research are largely crystalline [18,21] with amorphous cellulose found to be unstable in aqueous systems forming partially crystalline cellulose II [22]. Therefore, cellulose is very likely to be MW-transparent as the polysaccharide chains are constrained in the crystal lattice and not able to respond to the MW irradiation microscopically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The 30% untreated DSF biodegraded faster in the soil as compared to treated DSF biocomposites, with the weight loss of 5.6% at day-80. The untreated DSF contained a higher amount of amorphous materials such as lignin and hemicellulose, the disordered nature of amorphous region made it more susceptible for the microbial attack [10,11]. Moreover, the alkali pre-treatment step increased the interfacial adhesion between the fiber and the matrix [12], which gave resistance to the treated DSF composites neither hydrolysis nor microbial attack.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Soil Burial Testmentioning
confidence: 99%