2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanowhiskers from cotton fibres by controlled microbial hydrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
99
1
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
99
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak at 2θ= 16 o , 22.5 o and 36 o is correspond to cellulose I region for all samples. This is supported by Rosa et al [10] and Satyamurthy et al [13] The crystallinity index was determined for various samples and the results are summarized in Table 2. The crystallinity values of treated RH with 2M HNO 3 is 63.9% which is higher compared to others.…”
Section: Percentage Yieldmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The peak at 2θ= 16 o , 22.5 o and 36 o is correspond to cellulose I region for all samples. This is supported by Rosa et al [10] and Satyamurthy et al [13] The crystallinity index was determined for various samples and the results are summarized in Table 2. The crystallinity values of treated RH with 2M HNO 3 is 63.9% which is higher compared to others.…”
Section: Percentage Yieldmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…2e and f. The diameters of BCNW were several nanometer to dozens of nanometer, the length presented hundreds of nanometer, and the length to diameter (L/D) ratio were large. BCNWs with similar appearances were obtained with 55 wt% sulfuric acid for 4 h or 65 wt% sulfuric acid for 3 h. Interestingly, rod-like shapes and network-like BCNW structures were observed, which is different from those derived from jute (Kasyapi et al 2013), coconut husk (Fahma et al 2010), rice husk (Rosa et al 2012), and cotton (Satyamurthy et al 2011). It can possibly be attributed to the fibrillation of CNW, which occurred in the nanocellulose prepared with a homogenizer.…”
Section: Sem Analysismentioning
confidence: 76%
“…4), since the chemical nature of starch and cellulose is mostly similar, many of the characteristic peaks overlap and hence distinction is difficult. The characteristic peaks for cellulose (Oh et al 2005;Satyamurthy et al 2011) are the hydrogen-bonded stretching at 3,299 cm -1 , the OH bending of the adsorbed water at 1,644 cm -1 , the CH stretching at 2,921 cm -1 , the HCH and OCH in-plane bending vibrations at 1,430 cm -1 , the CH deformation vibration at 1,373 cm -1 , the COC, CCO, and CCH deformation modes and stretching vibrations in which the motions of the C-5 and C-6 atoms are at 850 cm -1 , and the C-OH out-of-plane bending mode around 670 cm -1 . These characteristics peaks for nanocellulose overlap with that of starch and hence a clear distinction was not observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%