2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of different zeolites from andesite rock: Product evaluation for efficient dye removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to these methods, adsorption gained paramount interest because of its easy manipulation and costeffectiveness for the direct adsorption of organic contaminants from water resources. 8,9 Several types of compounds have been reported to be used as adoptive materials, including mesoporous silicas, 10 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), 11,12 zeolites, 13,14 activated carbonaceous materials, [15][16][17][18] and porous organic polymers (POPs). [19][20][21] Among them, activated carbon and other carbonaceous materials suffer from a small pore size, MOFs suffer from instability in acidic solutions, and zeolites and mesoporous silicas suffer from hard functionalization leading to limited application in dye removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to these methods, adsorption gained paramount interest because of its easy manipulation and costeffectiveness for the direct adsorption of organic contaminants from water resources. 8,9 Several types of compounds have been reported to be used as adoptive materials, including mesoporous silicas, 10 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), 11,12 zeolites, 13,14 activated carbonaceous materials, [15][16][17][18] and porous organic polymers (POPs). [19][20][21] Among them, activated carbon and other carbonaceous materials suffer from a small pore size, MOFs suffer from instability in acidic solutions, and zeolites and mesoporous silicas suffer from hard functionalization leading to limited application in dye removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the porosity and specific surface area of the zeolite can be improved by removing contaminants from its pores. Meanwhile, zeolite's ability to adsorb salt ions onto its surface can be improved by enhancing its surface charge [7][8][9][10][11]. The activation process was carried out by placing zeolite granules between two stainless steel plates and then connecting the two plates to a DC voltage source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, adsorption is considered to be the simplest and cheapest operation, and has been widely used to remove pollutants. [14] With the continuous development and application of different adsorbents, a large number of nanomaterials such as graphene oxide, [15] activated carbon, [16] zeolite [17] and metal-organic framework [18] have been screened and applied extensively for MB removal. However, these adsorbents are tough to apply in practice due to their easy agglomeration, limited recovery rate, high cost, small adsorption capacity or low adsorption efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%