1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0315-5463(89)70537-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Characterization of Enzymic Milk Protein Hydrolysates from an Ultrafiltration Reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The updated collection of homologous protein sets of prokaryotes and eukaryotes is expected to be used for functional annotation of newly sequenced genomes, including those complex eukaryotes, as well as genome-wide evolutionary studies (Tatusov et al, 2003). Genomic sequencing has made it clear that a large fraction of the genes specifying the core biological functions are shared by all eukaryotes (Ashburner et al, 2000). In SMRT sequencing of the full-length transcriptome of the R. ferrugineus, a total of 27,707 FL transcripts were annotated into the GO database, most of which were biological processes, followed by cellular components and molecular functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The updated collection of homologous protein sets of prokaryotes and eukaryotes is expected to be used for functional annotation of newly sequenced genomes, including those complex eukaryotes, as well as genome-wide evolutionary studies (Tatusov et al, 2003). Genomic sequencing has made it clear that a large fraction of the genes specifying the core biological functions are shared by all eukaryotes (Ashburner et al, 2000). In SMRT sequencing of the full-length transcriptome of the R. ferrugineus, a total of 27,707 FL transcripts were annotated into the GO database, most of which were biological processes, followed by cellular components and molecular functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcripts function was annotated based on the following databases:NR (NCBI non-redundant protein sequences) (Deng et al, 2006), NT (NCBI non-redundant nucleotide sequences), Pfam (Protein family) (Finn et al, 2014), KOG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins) (Koonin et al, 2004), Swiss-Prot (A manually annotated and reviewed protein sequence database) (Apweiler et al, 2004), KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) (Kanehisa et al, 2004) and GO (Gene Ontology) (Ashburner M, 2000). The BLAST software with E-value ≤1e-5 was used for NT database analysis.…”
Section: Functional Annotation Of Transcriptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gene Ontology database (Ashburner et al, 2000;Sherlock, 2009) (GO: http://geneontology.org/, last access: 9 May 2021) is a structured, standard biological annotation system built in 2000 by an organization (Gene Ontology Consortium), and it aims at establishing a standard vocabulary systematic knowledge of genes and their products. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (Kanehisa et al, 2004;Teber et al, 2009) (https://www.kegg.jp/, last access: 9 May 2021) is a database resource for understanding high-level functions and utilities of the biological system, including the cell, the organism and the ecosystem, from molecular-level information, especially large-scale molecular datasets generated by genome sequencing and other high-throughput experimental technologies.…”
Section: Go and Kegg Pathway Enrichment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the function of genes, we used BLAST (version 2.2.26) (Altschul et al, 1997), HMMER 3.1 (Eddy, 1998), and KOBAS 3.0 (Xie et al, 2011) to search the NR (Li et al, 2002), Nt (Li et al, 2002), KOG (Koonin et al, 2004), COG (Tatusov et al, 2003), Swiss-prot (Amos and Rolf, 2000), KEGG (Minoru et al, 2004), GO (Ashburner et al, 2000), and protein family (Pfam) (Finn et al, 2016) databases. CPC v0.9 (Kong et al, 2007), CNCI v2 (Sun et al, 2013), PLEK v1.2 (Aimin et al (2014), and Pfam-scan (Finn et al, 2016) were used to identify lncRNAs from the Iso-Seq data (Chao et al, 2018).…”
Section: Identification and Functional Annotation Of Lncrnasmentioning
confidence: 99%