2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of Ir Pt1−O2 anode electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These non-noble metal oxides however do not show any catalytic activity for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in PEM electrolysis conditions and at the same time exhibit very poor electronic conductivity which is a major detriment to achieving the desired optimal charge transport kinetics. It has been reported [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] reduce the noble metal loading while facilitating the achievement of high electronic conductivity and catalytic activity though reports have identified that there is a limiting concentration of diluents and support structures beyond which the active surface area, electrical conductivity and electrochemical activity decrease [11,14,[16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Work from the present group of authors has demonstrated thin film solid solutions of F doped metal oxide (M x O y :F, M=Sn, Nb, Ta) containing low amount of IrO 2 or RuO 2 (~20 at.%) such as (Sn,Ir)O 2 :F, (Sn,Ru)O 2 :F, and (Ta,Ir)O 2 :F with electrochemical performance comparable to that of pure IrO 2 electrocatalyst [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These non-noble metal oxides however do not show any catalytic activity for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in PEM electrolysis conditions and at the same time exhibit very poor electronic conductivity which is a major detriment to achieving the desired optimal charge transport kinetics. It has been reported [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] reduce the noble metal loading while facilitating the achievement of high electronic conductivity and catalytic activity though reports have identified that there is a limiting concentration of diluents and support structures beyond which the active surface area, electrical conductivity and electrochemical activity decrease [11,14,[16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Work from the present group of authors has demonstrated thin film solid solutions of F doped metal oxide (M x O y :F, M=Sn, Nb, Ta) containing low amount of IrO 2 or RuO 2 (~20 at.%) such as (Sn,Ir)O 2 :F, (Sn,Ru)O 2 :F, and (Ta,Ir)O 2 :F with electrochemical performance comparable to that of pure IrO 2 electrocatalyst [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decrease in the noble metal oxide (IrO 2 /RuO 2 ) loading with improved catalytic activity would enable much reduction in capital costs of PEM electrolyzer cells. It has been reported previously by many researchers [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] that addition of cheaper metal oxides or diluents (viz., SnO 2 , Ta 2 O 5 , TiO 2 , Nb 2 O 5 ) to the parent noble metal oxide resulting in a binary or ternary metal oxide mixture could reduce the overall noble metal oxide content. However, with the addition of the cheaper diluents results in a reduction in the active surface area and electronic conductivity of the mixed oxides [17,18,24,[28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] , assuming standard conditions. They are thus reaction free energies and can be expressed as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%