2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.11.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of magnetic ferroscaffolds for tissue engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, magnetic scaffolds were prepared by insertion of nonactive iron oxide nanoparticles to nonmagnetic scaffolds, eg, by dip-coating of porous collagen or hydroxyapatite scaffolds in aqueous ferrofluids containing iron oxide nanoparticles, 17,19 or by in situ development of iron oxide nanoparticles in hydrogels. 20,21 In contrast, our magnetic scaffolds were prepared by in situ interaction of magnetic thrombin-conjugated nanoparticles with fibrinogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, magnetic scaffolds were prepared by insertion of nonactive iron oxide nanoparticles to nonmagnetic scaffolds, eg, by dip-coating of porous collagen or hydroxyapatite scaffolds in aqueous ferrofluids containing iron oxide nanoparticles, 17,19 or by in situ development of iron oxide nanoparticles in hydrogels. 20,21 In contrast, our magnetic scaffolds were prepared by in situ interaction of magnetic thrombin-conjugated nanoparticles with fibrinogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bock et al 19 succeeded in transforming standard commercial scaffolds, made of hydroxyapatite-collagen and pure collagen, to magnetic scaffolds by dip-coating the scaffolds in aqueous ferrofluids containing iron oxide nanoparticles. Hu et al 20 and Sivudu et al 21 fabricated magnetic hydrogel scaffolds by in situ development of iron oxide nanoparticles in gelatin or polyacrylamide hydrogels, respectively. It has been suggested to use the magnetic properties of these scaffolds for monitoring the scaffolds after implantation by MRI or X-ray, and for reloading the scaffolds after implantation with bioactive agents, such as growth factors, stem cells, or other bioactive reagents that can be bound to magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoparticles, especially magnetic ones, exhibit a very high tendency towards agglomeration. 3D porous materials functionalised with magnetic particles are generally obtained by way of immersion in a ferromagnetic liquid [1] with the use of co--precipitation methods [20], or using a variety of surfactants applied to the surface of the nanoparticles to prevent their agglomeration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al (2007) were able to make magnetic ferroscaffolds by an in situ precipitation process in which iron oxide nanoparticles were co-precipitated and deposited within a gelatin hydrogel. 94 They also found that by increasing the amount of iron oxide nanoparticles inside the ferroscaffold, the magnetic properties of the scaffold were enhanced. Hernandez et al (2009) nanoparticles into a hydrogel composed of different polymers, such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(acrylamide) (PAAm) and polysaccharides, depending on the functional groups present on the nanoparticle surface.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Magneto-responsive Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al (2007) were able to make magnetic ferroscaffolds by an in situ precipitation process in which iron oxide nanoparticles were co-precipitated and deposited within a gelatin hydrogel. 94 They also found that by increasing the amount of iron oxide nanoparticles inside the ferroscaffold, the magnetic properties of the scaffold were enhanced.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Magneto-responsive Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%