1975
DOI: 10.13182/nt75-a24365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Characterization of Neutron Dosimeter Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The oxalate product was washed with 0.2 M nitric acid, and calcined to the oxide at 450 to 480°C for 2 h. An SEM image of the PuO 2 from the oxalate presented in Figure 4-3 shows that this PuO 2 had particles ranging from <1 µm to a few µm. The XRD analyses confirmed the product was PuO 2 and a gamma energy analysis (GEA) of a nitric acid solution found 6×10 The 99.99-percent pure neptunium dioxide (NpO 2 ), originally prepared for use as a neutron dosimeter (Adair and Kobisk 1975), was confirmed by XRD analysis to be NpO 2 . Figure 4-4 shows that the NpO 2 was an aggregate of 1 to 10 µm-sized particles after crushing using a Wig-L-Bug grinder.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The oxalate product was washed with 0.2 M nitric acid, and calcined to the oxide at 450 to 480°C for 2 h. An SEM image of the PuO 2 from the oxalate presented in Figure 4-3 shows that this PuO 2 had particles ranging from <1 µm to a few µm. The XRD analyses confirmed the product was PuO 2 and a gamma energy analysis (GEA) of a nitric acid solution found 6×10 The 99.99-percent pure neptunium dioxide (NpO 2 ), originally prepared for use as a neutron dosimeter (Adair and Kobisk 1975), was confirmed by XRD analysis to be NpO 2 . Figure 4-4 shows that the NpO 2 was an aggregate of 1 to 10 µm-sized particles after crushing using a Wig-L-Bug grinder.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several sets of fissile materials used in the ILRR program ( 235 U, 238 U, and 239 Pu; 237 Np will not be discussed here) were procured and maintained by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for both reaction-rate measurements and cross-calibrating counting equipment at the participating laboratories [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. The isotopic composition of each material (oxide and metal) was verified by mass spectrometry, as well as coulometry and sparksource mass spectrometry.…”
Section: Ilrr Big Ten Irradiationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight percent of the major element and isotopic distribution for each target foil is provided in Table I. Impurity analysis of these materials is provided in Table II [61].…”
Section: Ilrr Big Ten Irradiationsmentioning
confidence: 99%