2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2011.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of nickel aluminosilicate nanocomposites for transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reactivity order is cyclohexanone (92%) > cycloheptanone (88%) > cyclododecanone (77%). But nickel/aluminosilicate catalyst yielded only 58% of cyclohexanone under similar reaction conditions [45]. 100% Selectivity was accomplished when carbonyl functionality was present in the side chain of the alicyclic ring (Table 3, entry 15).…”
Section: Extension Of Scopementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The reactivity order is cyclohexanone (92%) > cycloheptanone (88%) > cyclododecanone (77%). But nickel/aluminosilicate catalyst yielded only 58% of cyclohexanone under similar reaction conditions [45]. 100% Selectivity was accomplished when carbonyl functionality was present in the side chain of the alicyclic ring (Table 3, entry 15).…”
Section: Extension Of Scopementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Among these oxides, nickel was present as NiO, so that a reduction to Ni(0) was required. Production of Ni(0) nanoparticles used as catalyst for H-transfer hydrogenation has been previously performed by reduction of Ni(II) salts with several reducing agents, such as metal lithium [31][32][33][34][35], hydrazine [36][37][38][39][40], NaBH 4 [41][42][43], ethylene glycol [44][45][46], oleylamine/trioctylphosphine [47] or by thermal decomposition of nickel isopropoxide, prepared with an excess of Li, Na or K metal [48]. In spite of their efficiency, these reducing agents are toxic or hazardous to manipulate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-Acetylthiophene was reduced to 1-thiophene ethanol (72%) with high selectivity (Table 1, entry 17) while nickel aluminosilicate system gave only 48% of the product. 24 Similarly, 1-furyl ethanone yielded 1-furyl ethanol with a yield of 82% (Table 1, entry 18) whereas the MgO/Al 2 O 3 catalyzed reaction yielded only 50% of the product. 21 There can be two possible reasons for the higher catalytic activity of GNPs-RuNRs: (i) higher surface area of GNPs and (ii) effective dispersion of the GNPs-RuNRs in the reaction medium.…”
Section: Entry 12) It Is Worth Mentioning Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%