2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and performance evaluation of poly (amide–imide) and TiO2 nanoparticles impregnated polysulfone nanofiltration membranes in the removal of humic substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rajesh et al [74] used Newman method humic acid (as the model foulant and HA separation efficiency) in the separation of humic substance from aqueous streams and also applied to estimate the changes in surface free energy and fouling resistance of the membranes, respectively. The prepared membranes were prosperously applied in the separation of humic substance from aqueous streams.…”
Section: Improvement Of Antifouling and Other Membrane Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajesh et al [74] used Newman method humic acid (as the model foulant and HA separation efficiency) in the separation of humic substance from aqueous streams and also applied to estimate the changes in surface free energy and fouling resistance of the membranes, respectively. The prepared membranes were prosperously applied in the separation of humic substance from aqueous streams.…”
Section: Improvement Of Antifouling and Other Membrane Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many treatment process such as electrocoagulation (EC) (Ulu et al 2014), adsorption , nanofiltration (Rajesh et al 2013), catalytic ozonation (Choi and Rhee 2014), enhanced coagulation (Amin et al 2012) and photocatalysis (Hatakeyama et al 2012;Yuan et al 2013) have been developed for elimination of HS from water. In the past decade, photocatalysis processes have emerged as an efficient technology for removing of organic compounds from aquatic solutions (Gaya and Abdullah 2008;Patsios et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface fouling is the main challenge in a HA removal via UF process and plays a crucial role on the membrane performance . Fouling leads to a decrease in membrane efficiency and the resultant flux even after backwashing . The common approach to reduce the membrane fouling is increment of membrane hydrophilicity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, water permeability of the modified membranes was higher than that one for nascent membrane. Rajesh et al investigated the effect of TiO 2 and combination ratio of polyamide imide (PAI) and polysulfone (PSf) polymers on the separation of HA from water. They resulted that incorporation of PAI and TiO 2 nanoparticles has a huge effect on improvement of morphology, hydrophilicity, pure water flux (PWF), rejection, and antifouling properties of PSf/PAI membranes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%