2006
DOI: 10.1163/156856206777656490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and properties of invertase immobilized on a poly(maleic anhydride-hexen-1) membrane

Abstract: Poly(maleic anhydride-alt-hexen-1)(poly(MA-alt-H-1)) has been synthesized by radical polymerization and characterized by DSC, FT-IR, acid number determination, viscometric and NMR methods. Data showed that the co-polymer is an alternating co-polymer whose composition does not depend on the monomer feed composition. Invertase was immobilized onto a poly(MA-alt-H-1) membrane via glutaraldehyde and bovine serum albumin. The Km value of poly(MA-alt-H-1)-invertase was approximately 4.4-fold higher than the free enz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of 1,4-butylene fragments can therefore complicate MA-ethylene copolymerization under the high ethylene pressure. The result of the calculations are in agreement with early published data on the copolymerization of MA with different olefins [3,4,9,13,83,84], in particular, with low reactivity of 2-butenes and full inertness of TME towards MA in the presence of free-radical initiators [85].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The formation of 1,4-butylene fragments can therefore complicate MA-ethylene copolymerization under the high ethylene pressure. The result of the calculations are in agreement with early published data on the copolymerization of MA with different olefins [3,4,9,13,83,84], in particular, with low reactivity of 2-butenes and full inertness of TME towards MA in the presence of free-radical initiators [85].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Stability enhancements have been shown after attachment to many different carriers, examples are magnetic beads (Qiu et al, 2005), mesoporous sol-gel glass (Wang et al, 2001), silica nanospheres (Wang and Caruso, 2004), Sepabeads (Rocchietti et al, 2004), agarose (Rocchietti et al, 2004), and protein-coated microcrystals (Kreiner and Parker, 2005). Many different conjugation chemistries have been used, relying on amine, epoxy, maleic anhydride, glyoxal, biotin/streptavidin, and many other reactive functional groups for enzyme immobilization (Leckband and Langer, 1991;López-Gallego et al, 2013;Maeda et al, 2008;Mateo et al, 2007a;Mazi et al, 2006;Tasso et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2011). The chemical interactions used for surface attachment/adsorption may primarily be divided into three categories: Van der Waals-based adsorption, ionic adsorption, and covalent attachment (Sheldon, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Mainly, the methods are divided into 2 categories: covalent bonding and entrapping. While the possibility of loss of the immobilized enzyme exists, through leakage or dissolution, it is small for immobilization achieved by covalent bonding [9][10][11] and cross-linking, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and there remains fear of enzyme activity loss due to reagents used in the bonding reaction; there are means for prolonging the duration of enzyme stability, but the enzyme may be damaged during such immobilization processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%