2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of a novel amino functionalized ion-imprinted hybrid monolithic column for the selective extraction of trace copper followed by ICP-MS detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24 Nevertheless, this can be eliminated by sample pretreatment before analysis and thus, an extraction and preconcentration step is oen pre-requisite to instrumental determination. [25][26][27] Considering the nanoadsorbents, solid phase microextraction and dispersive solid phase microextraction (DSPME) is one among the most promising approach for the separation and preconcentration of metal ions presented at trace or ultra-trace level in complex matrix solutions. [28][29][30][31] Traditional adsorbents such as ion exchange resin, zeolites, activated carbon and clays have been studied for the adsorption of mercury ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Nevertheless, this can be eliminated by sample pretreatment before analysis and thus, an extraction and preconcentration step is oen pre-requisite to instrumental determination. [25][26][27] Considering the nanoadsorbents, solid phase microextraction and dispersive solid phase microextraction (DSPME) is one among the most promising approach for the separation and preconcentration of metal ions presented at trace or ultra-trace level in complex matrix solutions. [28][29][30][31] Traditional adsorbents such as ion exchange resin, zeolites, activated carbon and clays have been studied for the adsorption of mercury ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WHO has actually advocated for a more stringent arsenic drinking water standard, with a maximum permitted content of 10 ppb. As­(III) is more mobile under aqueous conditions and is significantly more hazardous to humans than As­(V). , Because of the low concentration of analyte ions and/or matrix interferences, direct detection of ultratrace As­(III) concentrations using spectroscopic techniques remains difficult. These sophisticated instruments are not sensitive enough to detect low-level concentrations with a complex sample matrix. , The development of trace metal ion measurement methods, on the other hand, could help improve their monitoring and assessment and therefore reduce the occurrence of health problems linked to heavy metal ions. The quantification of new toxins is a common research topic that may be used to track contamination levels, evaluate control measure effectiveness, and assess biota consequences. Therefore, to eliminate matrix components and improve the detection limit, sample extraction and preconcentration procedures should be employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20−22 These sophis-ticated instruments are not sensitive enough to detect low-level concentrations with a complex sample matrix. 23,24 The development of trace metal ion measurement methods, on the other hand, could help improve their monitoring and assessment and therefore reduce the occurrence of health problems linked to heavy metal ions. 25−27 The quantification of new toxins is a common research topic that may be used to track contamination levels, evaluate control measure effectiveness, and assess biota consequences.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods are known for the determination of Cu­(II) such as atomic absorption spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry . These methods have good stability and accuracy for the determination of Cu­(II) in the laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%