1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-3057(98)00056-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of aromatic polyamide membrane for alcohol dehydration by pervaporation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This occurs because increased osmotic driving force impacts primarily the water transport (water chemical potential), while the ethanol driving force is fixed as the concentration difference between the feed and draw solutions. The increased water flux diluted the permeating ethanol by up to 34% for the TFC and 27% for the CTA, a result similar to that observed in works related to pervaporation experiments to dehydrate ethanol using hydrophilic crystalline polymers, such as poly­(vinyl alcohol), , cellulose acetate, and polyamide . The ethanol fluxes varied between 0.1 and 0.2 kg m –2 h –1 for the TFC membrane and between 0.1 and 0.3 kg m –2 h –1 for the CTA during the FO experiments, without noticeable effect among different osmotic pressures.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This occurs because increased osmotic driving force impacts primarily the water transport (water chemical potential), while the ethanol driving force is fixed as the concentration difference between the feed and draw solutions. The increased water flux diluted the permeating ethanol by up to 34% for the TFC and 27% for the CTA, a result similar to that observed in works related to pervaporation experiments to dehydrate ethanol using hydrophilic crystalline polymers, such as poly­(vinyl alcohol), , cellulose acetate, and polyamide . The ethanol fluxes varied between 0.1 and 0.2 kg m –2 h –1 for the TFC membrane and between 0.1 and 0.3 kg m –2 h –1 for the CTA during the FO experiments, without noticeable effect among different osmotic pressures.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The experiment was carried out according to a reported procedure [37]. The feed solution was in direct contact with membrane, in the pervaporation apparatus.…”
Section: Methanol Permeation Measurement By Pervaporation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was carried out according to the reported process [27]. The feed solution was in direct contact with membrane, in the pervaporation apparatus.…”
Section: Methanol Permeation Measurement By Pervaporation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%