“…It was observed that the experimental values obtained were in good agreement with the values predicted from the models, with relatively small errors between the predicted and the actual values, which was only 3.05% and 1.61%, for CO 2 permeance and C0 2/CH 4 permselectivity, respectively. high thermai and chemical stability [1], Furthermore, eMS membranes are amorphous in nature, In addition, CMS membranes are tougher and more flexible [2], For gas separation process, the membranes needs to exhibit molecular sieving capabilities with pore size near the dimension of gas molecules to be separated [3], CMS membranes contain a thin carbon layerhaving pores with a size smallerthan 1nm, which allowthe gases separation such as oxygen (0,) and nitrogen (N,) from air [4], Pure 0, is widely used for medical purposes while pure N, is used for blanketing perishable fruits and also for shipment offlammable liquids, Suda and Haraya [5] pyrolyzed Kapton polyimlde at 800"C and obtained CMS membrane As the pyrolysis temperature increases, the surface area and pore volume decreases. Sample CMS700 shows narrower FSD at approximately 0.41 nm compared to CMS800 and CMS900 as shown in The porous membrane support was made by blending phenolic resin (60%) and carbon black (30%) together with cellulose acetate (10%) as binder.…”