2000
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2000.10462997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of Cooperating Teachers as Evaluators in Early Field Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation for this finding could be found in Ramanathan and Wilkins-Canter (2000). They found that most cooperating teachers received no specific training on supervision techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One explanation for this finding could be found in Ramanathan and Wilkins-Canter (2000). They found that most cooperating teachers received no specific training on supervision techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The just-in-time use of the ATLT was also consistent with findings from AT literature, where Kent (2001) suggested that AT training occur as close as possible to the time of the field experience. Further to this, associate teachers indicated they preferred training and supports typically on an as needed basis (Kent, 2001;Ramanathan & Wilkins-Canter, 1997). These findings reflect the flexible, accessible, and convenient nature of learning tools on the Internet.…”
Section: Times Dates Location Variedmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As previously explained, oftentimes, lack of time, lack of remuneration, attitudes, willingness, and beliefs prevent associate teacher training from occurring (Kent, 2001;Ramanathan & Wilkins-Canter, 1997). If these issues are prominent in the field experience, using non-technological based strategies to provide training and supports, it might also be prudent to consider factors that might prevent or enhance associate teacher acceptance and usage of a new technology such as the ATLT.…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations