2020
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201901285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of hydrophilic molecularly imprinted solid‐phase microextraction fiber for the selective removal and extraction of trace tetracyclines residues in animal derived foods

Abstract: The present work reported a novel hydrophilic and selective solid-phase microextraction fiber by improved multiple co-polymerization method immobilization of tetracycline molecularly imprinted polymer on a stainless steel wire and directly coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography for sensitive determination of trace tetracyclines residues in animal derived foods. The developed molecularly imprinted polymer coated solid-phase microextraction fibers were characterized through scanning electron microsc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other extraction methods SPE, QuEChERS, LLE, ASE, MSPD and several other kinds of extraction techniques are employed to detect medicine residues in foods derived from animals (Table 3). Other methods include DLLME (dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Mookantsa et al, 2016), FPSE (fabric-phase sorptive extraction; Samanidou et al, 2015), UAE (ultrasound-assisted extraction;Chen et al, 2016), LPME (liquid-phase microextraction; Tajabadi et al, 2016), TFC (turbulent flow chromatography; Aguilera-Luiz et al, 2013), GPC (gel permeation chromatography; Chico et al, 2013), SPME (as known as solid-phase microextraction; Lu et al, 2020), SLE (solid-liquid extraction; Charitonos et al, 2017).…”
Section: Compares the Pros And Cons Of Five Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other extraction methods SPE, QuEChERS, LLE, ASE, MSPD and several other kinds of extraction techniques are employed to detect medicine residues in foods derived from animals (Table 3). Other methods include DLLME (dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Mookantsa et al, 2016), FPSE (fabric-phase sorptive extraction; Samanidou et al, 2015), UAE (ultrasound-assisted extraction;Chen et al, 2016), LPME (liquid-phase microextraction; Tajabadi et al, 2016), TFC (turbulent flow chromatography; Aguilera-Luiz et al, 2013), GPC (gel permeation chromatography; Chico et al, 2013), SPME (as known as solid-phase microextraction; Lu et al, 2020), SLE (solid-liquid extraction; Charitonos et al, 2017).…”
Section: Compares the Pros And Cons Of Five Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target molecules can be selectively enriched and separated by synthesizing proper MIPs with binding site, so different molecules can be purified and separated from complex aquatic samples [58,59,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105]. Lu et al [101] prepared SPME fiber with hydrophilic MIP coating for selective removal and extraction of trace tetracyclines residues in fish derived foods. Moreover, MIP can be also combined with other advanced materials to construct dual-function absorbent or sensor for the safety analysis of aquatic products ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Molecularly/ions Imprinted Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The schematic representation of tetracycline MIP‐SPME fiber preparation (reprinted from [101] with permission)…”
Section: Advanced Materials For Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To compare the real power exponent with the power exponents of simulations in a scientific and rigorous manner, this paper applies two indicators of relative error, namely, relative error (RE) and relative SD (RSD). These two indicators are characterized by meticulousness and are usually used in medical and pharmaceutical fields (Lu et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2004). Then, the coincidence between the simulation data and the real data (Taylor, 1997) is measured by RE and RSD, which are shown as equations ( 1) and ( 2):…”
Section: Descriptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%