Preparation of Multi-Motive Grid Questionnaire for Social Networking Sites Use

Hou, Juan; Zhu, Yingge; Tong, Jie; Ndasauka, Yamikani; Fang, Xiaoyi

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233205

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Otherwise, the scale item is indistinguishable from the information and the design is unreasonable. It should be deleted ( 16 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operating room nurse's awareness and implementation status of the prevention of patient's intraoperative acquired pressure injuries: design and validation of a questionnaire

Zou,

Lv,

Gao

et al. 2024

Front. Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo compile the awareness and implementation status of patients with intraoperative acquired pressure injuries prevention by operating room nurses and to test its reliability and validity.DesignThis is an equipment development research based on recommendations for developing a reliable and valid questionnaire.MethodsThe research was carried out in two phases from February to November 2022. Through a panel discussion, expert consultation, and literature review, the questionnaire for operating room nurses on the current status of awareness and implementation of the prevention of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries was preliminarily formulated. The formal questionnaire was developed through validity analysis, reliability analysis and item analysis, and reliability and validity tests were conducted. Moreover, according to the questionnaire survey results, confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to construct the structural equation model.ResultsThe initial questionnaire consisted of five dimensions with 48 items, which was finalized to five dimensions with 38 items after reliability and validity testing and analysis. The five dimensions included implementation of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries prevention, intraoperative acquired pressure injuries preventing cognitive conditions, preoperative intraoperative acquired pressure injuries preventing cognitive conditions, basic knowledge of pressure injuries, and implementation of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries prevention in special patients. Cronbach's α of the overall questionnaire was 0.969 while that of each dimension was 0.846–0.959. The KMO value of structural validity was 0.945 (P < 0.001), and the contribution rate of cumulative variance was 70.694%. The fitting of confirmatory factor analysis was found to be generally ideal: χ2/df = 2.382, RMR = 0.027, TLI = 0.894, RMSEA = 0.072, IFI = 0.905, CFI = 0.904.ConclusionsThe study and design of the questionnaire for operating room nurses on the current status of awareness and implementation of the prevention of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries are scientific and rational, providing a scientific basis for the standardized reform of hospitals and the optimization of the intraoperative acquired pressure injuries management system of the operating room.

show abstract

“…Otherwise, the scale item is indistinguishable from the information and the design is unreasonable. It should be deleted ( 16 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operating room nurse's awareness and implementation status of the prevention of patient's intraoperative acquired pressure injuries: design and validation of a questionnaire

Zou,

Lv,

Gao

et al. 2024

Front. Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the option to provide pictures either as a stimulus or as a response can be a rich source of data. For example, a study design could require participants to produce and transmit images of their work environment or office desk (e.g., online ESM surveys, Arnold & Rohn, 2019), take part in picture-rating exercises (e.g., Wilson et al, 2018), test a construct via pictures (e.g., Hou et al, 2020), or reflect on a topic specifically revolving around pictures (e.g., Rennung et al, 2016).…”

Section: By Lowering Response Frustration With Displaymentioning

confidence: 99%

Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality

Quaquebeke

Salem²,

Dijke

et al. 2022

Organizational Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conducting organizational research via online surveys and experiments offers a host of advantages over traditional forms of data collection when it comes to sampling for more advanced study designs, while also ensuring data quality. To draw attention to these advantages and encourage researchers to fully leverage them, the present paper is structured into two parts. First, along a structure of commonly used research designs, we showcase select organizational psychology (OP) and organizational behavior (OB) research and explain how the Internet makes it feasible to conduct research not only with larger and more representative samples, but also with more complex research designs than circumstances usually allow in offline settings. Subsequently, because online data collections often also come with some data quality concerns, in the second section, we synthesize the methodological literature to outline three improvement areas and several accompanying strategies for bolstering data quality. Plain Language Summary: These days, many theories from the fields of organizational psychology and organizational behavior are tested online simply because it is easier. The point of this paper is to illustrate the unique advantages of the Internet beyond mere convenience—specifically, how the related technologies offer more than simply the ability to mirror offline studies. Accordingly, our paper first guides readers through examples of more ambitious online survey and experimental research designs within the organizational domain. Second, we address the potential data quality drawbacks of these approaches by outlining three concrete areas of improvement. Each comes with specific recommendations that can ensure higher data quality when conducting organizational survey or experimental research online.

show abstract

“…It is usually assumed that such measured motives are transsituational (they should relate to situations of all kinds). However, it seems plausible that specific motives might be addressed more strongly in mobility-associated situations, especially if people have a certain frailty level which is associated with higher age (see also Hou et al, 2020, for an adaption of the original MMG to Social Networking Use). Therefore, the aim of the current study is to develop a motive grid assessing the three fundamental psychological motives of achievement, affiliation, and power as well as their corresponding hope and fear components in mobility and non-mobility situations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Achievement, Affiliation, and Power Motives in Mobility Situations: Development of the Multi-Motive Grid Mobility

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study introduces the Multi-Motive Grid Mobility (MMG-M) in an age-stratified sample (N = 206) that aims to disentangle six motive components – hope of success, hope of affiliation, hope of power, fear of failure, fear of rejection, and fear of power – in mobility-related and mobility-unrelated scenarios. Similar to the classical Multi-Motive Grid (MMG), we selected 14 picture scenarios representing seven mobility and seven non-mobility situations. The scenarios were combined with 12 statements from the MMG. Both the MMG-M and MMG were assessed to allow comparability between psychometric criteria. The results of confirmatory factor analyses yielded a good model fit for a six-factor solution with an additional mobility factor for the MMG-M. Internal consistency of the items was similar to the MMG. Lastly, we investigated associations between the motive components and mobility-related variables. We found that risk awareness was positively related to all fear components in both mobility and non-mobility scenarios. Most importantly, physical constraint was positively associated with fear of rejection and fear of power in mobility situations underlining the importance to create support systems to reduce these concerns in people’s everyday lives.

show abstract

Preparation of Multi-Motive Grid Questionnaire for Social Networking Sites Use

Cited by 4 publications

References 35 publications

Operating room nurse's awareness and implementation status of the prevention of patient's intraoperative acquired pressure injuries: design and validation of a questionnaire

Operating room nurse's awareness and implementation status of the prevention of patient's intraoperative acquired pressure injuries: design and validation of a questionnaire

Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality

Measuring Achievement, Affiliation, and Power Motives in Mobility Situations: Development of the Multi-Motive Grid Mobility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About