2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-020-04850-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of Ni1 − xFex nanoparticles with a composition gradient and a proposed formation mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…65 Notably, the coercivity values achieved in this study were in the same range as those observed in the literature for Ni-NPs produced using various techniques. 66 The coercivity (H c ), remanence magnetization (M r ), and saturation magnetization (M s ) values decrease with increasing temperature from 5 to 300 K for both samples (as shown in Figure S4a−c). The H c and M r values of Ni-OC are smaller than those of Ni-NPs, while M s are higher.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…65 Notably, the coercivity values achieved in this study were in the same range as those observed in the literature for Ni-NPs produced using various techniques. 66 The coercivity (H c ), remanence magnetization (M r ), and saturation magnetization (M s ) values decrease with increasing temperature from 5 to 300 K for both samples (as shown in Figure S4a−c). The H c and M r values of Ni-OC are smaller than those of Ni-NPs, while M s are higher.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The spin disorder at the surface or surface oxidation of Ni nanoparticles can cause a low value of M S . Notably, the coercivity values achieved in this study were in the same range as those observed in the literature for Ni-NPs produced using various techniques . The coercivity ( H c ), remanence magnetization ( M r ), and saturation magnetization ( M s ) values decrease with increasing temperature from 5 to 300 K for both samples (as shown in Figure S4a–c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%