Preparation of novel arsenic-imprinted polymer for the selective extraction and enhanced adsorption of toxic As3+ ions from the aqueous environment

Jagirani, Muhammad Saqaf; Balouch, Aamna; Mahesar, Sarfaraz Ahmed; Kumar, Aneel; Abdullah, .; Mustafai, Faraz Ahmed; Bhanger, Muhammad Iqbal

doi:10.1007/s00289-019-03008-2

Cited by 20 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Optimization of these variables and maximum adsorption would allow comparison of adsorption capacities with other reports. However, selectivity results were consistent with results from others [ 36 , 53 ]. To the best of our knowledge, the combination of MIPs with g-C 3 N 4 has not been reported for arsenate removal.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…While not directly comparable, other studies have reported total capacities at optimized conditions of 5.24 mg/g [ 52 ] and 106.3 mg/g [ 36 ] of arsenite in imprinted polymers, although not arsenate. The materials reported have been optimized for pH, time, and sorbent dose.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The materials reported have been optimized for pH, time, and sorbent dose. Jagirani et al [ 36 ] also evaluated competitive adsorption with several other ions, showing selectivity coefficients between 1.781 with nitrate ions (NO 3 − ) and 2.590 with sulfate ions (SO 4 2− ). However, arsenite and chloride ion competition was not reported.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Development of Adsorptive Membranes for Selective Removal of Contaminants in Water

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The presence of arsenic and ammonia in ground and surface waters has resulted in severe adverse effects to human health and the environment. Removal technologies for these contaminants include adsorption and membrane processes. However, materials with high selectivity and pressure stability still need to be developed. In this work, adsorbents and adsorptive membranes were prepared using nanostructured graphitic carbon nitride decorated with molecularly imprinted acrylate polymers templated for arsenate and ammonia. The developed adsorbent removed arsenate at a capacity and selectivity similar to commercial ion-exchange resins. Ammonia was removed at higher capacity than commercial ion exchange resins, but the adsorbent showed lower selectivity. Additionally, the prepared membranes removed more arsenate and ammonia than non-imprinted controls, even in competition with abundant ions in water. Further optimization is required to improve pressure stability and selectivity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of Adsorptive Membranes for Selective Removal of Contaminants in Water

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Heavy metal ions [ 1 , 2 ] and organic pollutants [ 3 , 4 ] are common pollutants in water which pose a serious threat to human health and the ecological environment. The most commonly toxic heavy metal ions in water include Cr(VI) [ 5 , 6 , 7 ], As(III) [ 8 ], Cd(II) [ 9 ], Hg(II) [ 10 ], Pb(II) [ 11 ], Cu(II) [ 12 ], Zn(II) [ 13 ], etc. The main organic pollutants include phenolic compounds [ 14 , 15 ], benzene compounds [ 16 , 17 ], halohydrocarbons [ 18 , 19 ] and so on.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simultaneous Removal of Cr(VI) and Phenol from Water Using Silica-di-Block Polymer Hybrids: Adsorption Kinetics and Thermodynamics

Yang

Gong

et al. 2022

Polymers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Heavy metal ions and organic pollutants often coexist in industrial effluents. In this work, silica-di-block polymer hybrids (SiO2-g-PBA-b-PDMAEMA) with two ratios (SiO2/BA/DMAEMA = 1/50/250 and 1/60/240) were designed and prepared for the simultaneous removal of Cr(VI) and phenol via a surface-initiated atom-transfer radical polymerization process using butyl methacrylate (BA) as a hydrophobic monomer and 2-(Dimethylamino)ethylmethacrylate (DMAEMA) as a hydrophilic monomer. The removal efficiency of Cr(VI) and phenol by the hybrids reached 88.25% and 88.17%, respectively. The sample with a larger proportion of hydrophilic PDMAEMA showed better adsorption of Cr(VI), and the sample with a larger proportion of hydrophobic PBA showed better adsorption of phenol. In binary systems, the presence of Cr(VI) inhibited the adsorption of phenol, yet the presence of phenol had a negligible effect on the adsorption of Cr(VI). Kinetics studies showed that the adsorption of Cr(VI) and phenol fitted the pseudo-second-order model well. Thermodynamic studies showed that the adsorption behavior of Cr(VI) and phenol were better described by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation, and the adsorption of Cr(VI) and phenol were all spontaneous adsorptions driven by enthalpy. The adsorbent still possessed good adsorption capacity for Cr(VI) and phenol after six adsorption–desorption cycles. These findings show that SiO2-g-PBA-b-PDMAEMA hybrids represent a satisfying adsorption material for the simultaneous removal of heavy metal ions and organic pollutants.

show abstract

“…It is considered a cost-effective technology, and one of the most promising ways to remove arsenic from the water solution [15], [16]. Adsorption from inorganic resources by low-cost adsorbents is regarded as less costly than membrane separation and more flexible than ion exchange [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Study between Imprinted Polymer Technology and Economic Adsorption Methodologies for the Removal of Arsenic Species from Water

Samah

2021

cst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Among the various arsenic sources in the environment, water may pose the greatest threat to human health. Arsenic and its compounds are known to have adverse health effects on humans, including skin cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and lung cancer, as well as vascular diseases of the legs and feet. There are a few separation methods that have been studied to remove arsenic species from water. Methods to remove arsenic species such as adsorption and ion exchange, coagulation and flocculation and membrane filtration have been developed to remove arsenic species from water. However, certain separation methods require a sophisticated equipment and are too expensive. From the different possible methods, this review is based in adsorption studies using imprinted polymer technology and economic sorbents as a media to remove arsenic from water. The details of adsorption processes for imprinted polymer technology have been discussed briefly and the comparative properties for arsenic species removal using different types of sorbents has been addressed significantly for being a user-friendly, highly extended and inexpensive methodology. However, a few drawbacks for each sorbent have been determined and the details was included in this review.

show abstract

Preparation of novel arsenic-imprinted polymer for the selective extraction and enhanced adsorption of toxic As3+ ions from the aqueous environment

Cited by 20 publications

References 38 publications

Development of Adsorptive Membranes for Selective Removal of Contaminants in Water

Development of Adsorptive Membranes for Selective Removal of Contaminants in Water

Simultaneous Removal of Cr(VI) and Phenol from Water Using Silica-di-Block Polymer Hybrids: Adsorption Kinetics and Thermodynamics

Comparative Study between Imprinted Polymer Technology and Economic Adsorption Methodologies for the Removal of Arsenic Species from Water

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About