2021
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2021.26896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of PAN/lycopene-TiO2 nanocomposite membrane for azo dye degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be the result of surface roughness, which enhances the ability of BSA to attach to membrane surfaces. Subsequently, by increasing the concentration of NPs, the amount of FRR has been decreased, which is due to increased roughness and enhanced interaction between BSA molecules and the membrane surface, which leads to a decrease in FRR 54–56 . The reversible fouling is caused by protein deposits on the membrane surface that is simply removed by washing, while the irreversible fouling is affected by protein attachments or adsorptions in the pores and is difficult to clean up only by hydraulics 48 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be the result of surface roughness, which enhances the ability of BSA to attach to membrane surfaces. Subsequently, by increasing the concentration of NPs, the amount of FRR has been decreased, which is due to increased roughness and enhanced interaction between BSA molecules and the membrane surface, which leads to a decrease in FRR 54–56 . The reversible fouling is caused by protein deposits on the membrane surface that is simply removed by washing, while the irreversible fouling is affected by protein attachments or adsorptions in the pores and is difficult to clean up only by hydraulics 48 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, by increasing the concentration of NPs, the amount of FRR has been decreased, which is due to increased roughness and enhanced interaction between BSA molecules and the membrane surface, which leads to a decrease in FRR. [54][55][56] The reversible fouling is caused by protein deposits on the membrane surface that is simply removed by washing, while the irreversible fouling is affected by protein attachments or adsorptions in the pores and is difficult to clean up only by hydraulics. 48 As can be seen in Table 4, the irreversible and reversible fouling in the pure PAN membrane were 35.9% and 20.46%, in the PAN-SiO 2 -1%, MMM were 10.06% and 73.25%, and in the PAN-MCM41-1%, MMM were 18.25% and 38.01%, respectively.…”
Section: Investigating the Effect Of Sio 2 And Mcm-41 Nps On The Filt...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photocatalytic membranes, which combine membrane filtration with photocatalytic degradation of organics and subsequent antibacterial treatment in a single system, have shown great prospects in water and wastewater treatment settings [12,[123][124][125][126][127]. Furthermore, membrane flux is a critical parameter for the photocatalytic membrane system, as it can be enhanced by multilayered deposition of TiO 2 nanoparticles on the membrane surface, but pore blockage can minimize water flux in some cases [20,87].…”
Section: Application Of Tio 2 -Based Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%