2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of polyaminated Fe3O4@chitosan core-shell magnetic nanoparticles for efficient adsorption of phosphate in aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, these results are consistent with results published by Khmara et al and Fu et al, who describe a similar effect of reduced Ms in chitosan functionalized magnetic nanoparticles [ 44 , 45 ]. Gregorio-Jauregui et al obtained values of magnetic saturation of chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles (CMNP) of around 65.6 ± 0.1 emu/g [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, these results are consistent with results published by Khmara et al and Fu et al, who describe a similar effect of reduced Ms in chitosan functionalized magnetic nanoparticles [ 44 , 45 ]. Gregorio-Jauregui et al obtained values of magnetic saturation of chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles (CMNP) of around 65.6 ± 0.1 emu/g [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Lower saturation magnetization of MC1 microparticles could be explained with TEM analysis, where the structure of magnetic multi-cores homogeneously dispersed in chitosan is clearly visible; otherwise, a different magnetic core-chitosan shell structure is observed in MC2 microparticles, leading to higher saturation magnetization of the microparticles. [44,45]. Gregorio-Jauregui et al obtained values of magnetic saturation of chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles (CMNP) of around 65.6 ± 0.1 emu/g [46].…”
Section: Figure 5 Magnetization Curves Of Chitosan Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles In Comparison Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature has reported the fabrication of composites based on chitosan as bio-supports and modified with different nanomaterials such as FeO and TiO 2 nanoparticles. Among the explored nanocomposites are found, cross-linked magnetic ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)/chitosan/TiO 2 , chitosan modified with N, S-doped TiO 2 , magnetic thiourea-chitosan, and polyaminated Fe 3 O 4 @chitosan core–shell magnetic nanoparticles . Adsorption experiments in aqueous solutions using chitosan composites have shown maximum adsorption capacities up to 58.6, 16.6, 6.1, 2.5, 1.2, and 0.9 mg/g for removal of benzene, toluene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, acenaphthylene, and fluorene, respectively. , Besides, these methodologies are complex due to the use of more toxic chemicals such as hexane, methanol, and ethanol, high energy consumption due to the implementation of temperature, and longer procedures of synthesis up to 12 h. , To the best of our knowledge, no studies are exploring the combination of FeO and TiO 2 nanoparticles (Ch-FeO/TiO 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were constructed by the chemical co-precipitation method. 34 Approximately 1.7 g of Fe( ii ) and 4.75 g of Fe( iii ) salts were dissolved in deionized water (200 ml). The mixture was stirred at 60 °C under N 2 atmosphere, then 7.5 ml of NH 3 solution was added.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%