2019
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201900053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of porous aromatic framework modified graphene oxide for pipette‐tip solid‐phase extraction of theophylline in tea

Abstract: A new material called as porous aromatic frameworks modified graphene oxide (PAFs‐GO) was synthesized, and it was used as an adsorbent in pipette‐tip SPE for the effective purification and enrichment of theophylline in tea sample by HPLC. The properties of PAFs‐GO were characterized by field emission SEM, FTIR, thermogravimetry analysis and Brunauer Emmett Teller N2 adsorption‐desorption analysis. The results of static adsorption and dynamic adsorption test showed PAFs‐GO had higher adsorption ability (93.25 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the sample pretreatment procedure to separate and enrich TP from complex samples is indispensable before chromatographic analysis. In recent years, some methods, including liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) [ 9 ], electromembrane extraction (EME) [ 10 ], pipette-tip solid-phase extraction (PT-SPE) [ 11 ], ultrasound-assisted surfactant-enhanced emulsification microextraction (UA-SEME) [ 12 ], dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) [ 13 ], and solid-phase extraction (SPE) [ 14 ] have been reported. However, there are some disadvantages of these methods, derived from the low extraction capacity, complicated procedures, and consumption of toxic organic solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the sample pretreatment procedure to separate and enrich TP from complex samples is indispensable before chromatographic analysis. In recent years, some methods, including liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) [ 9 ], electromembrane extraction (EME) [ 10 ], pipette-tip solid-phase extraction (PT-SPE) [ 11 ], ultrasound-assisted surfactant-enhanced emulsification microextraction (UA-SEME) [ 12 ], dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) [ 13 ], and solid-phase extraction (SPE) [ 14 ] have been reported. However, there are some disadvantages of these methods, derived from the low extraction capacity, complicated procedures, and consumption of toxic organic solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%