2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of porous YSZ ceramics by ball milling foaming-freeze drying process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, porous (Y 0.25 Ho 0.25 Yb 0.25 Lu 0.25 ) 2 Si 2 O 7 has a lower thermal conductivity 12,13,[20][21][22][23][24][25] and relatively higher compressive strength. 12,[26][27][28][29][30][31] In terms of thermal conductivity, the value of 0.068 W/(m⋅K) (porosity: 94.40%) in this work is lower than the 0.090 W/(m⋅K) of porous YSZ f /Y 2 Si 2 O 7 (porosity: 92.9%), 12 0.077 W/(m⋅K) of YSZ f /(Y 0.8 Ho 0.2 ) 2 Si 2 O 7 (porosity: 93.2%), 13 97.5%). 20 As for the compressive strength, the 1.14 MPa of porous (Y 0.25 Ho 0.25 Yb 0.25 Lu 0.25 ) 2 Si 2 O 7 (porosity: 93.10%) is higher than the 0.99 MPa of porous YSZ f /Y 2 Si 2 O 7 (porosity: 93.5%), 12 0.80 MPa of hydroxyapatite (porosity: 92.0%), 26 and 0.44 MPa of ZrO 2 (porosity: 92.5%).…”
Section: Porosity Compressive Strength and Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, porous (Y 0.25 Ho 0.25 Yb 0.25 Lu 0.25 ) 2 Si 2 O 7 has a lower thermal conductivity 12,13,[20][21][22][23][24][25] and relatively higher compressive strength. 12,[26][27][28][29][30][31] In terms of thermal conductivity, the value of 0.068 W/(m⋅K) (porosity: 94.40%) in this work is lower than the 0.090 W/(m⋅K) of porous YSZ f /Y 2 Si 2 O 7 (porosity: 92.9%), 12 0.077 W/(m⋅K) of YSZ f /(Y 0.8 Ho 0.2 ) 2 Si 2 O 7 (porosity: 93.2%), 13 97.5%). 20 As for the compressive strength, the 1.14 MPa of porous (Y 0.25 Ho 0.25 Yb 0.25 Lu 0.25 ) 2 Si 2 O 7 (porosity: 93.10%) is higher than the 0.99 MPa of porous YSZ f /Y 2 Si 2 O 7 (porosity: 93.5%), 12 0.80 MPa of hydroxyapatite (porosity: 92.0%), 26 and 0.44 MPa of ZrO 2 (porosity: 92.5%).…”
Section: Porosity Compressive Strength and Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porous ceramics have been widely used in thermal insulators, gas/liquid filtration, and sound absorption fields because of their good mechanical strength, high porosity, large specific surface area, and low thermal conductivity. , In recent years, many preparation methods for porous ceramics have been developed such as pore-forming agents, , a polymeric sponge replica technique, gelcasting, , freeze casting, , foam-gelcasting, , etc. Of these methods, foam-gelcasting is the most popular method for preparing insulation porous ceramics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, inorganic thermal insulation materials, especially porous ceramics, showed high porosity, low thermal conductivity, good mechanical strength, excellent heat insulation properties, and high-temperature resistance, which have been widely used in industrial fields with extremely severe conditions. 5 To date, several techniques for preparing porous ceramics have been developed, such as organic foam impregnation 6 , freeze-drying 7 , sol-gel 8 , 3D printing, 9 and direct gel-foaming. 10 Among the above methods, the direct gel-foaming technology is regarded as the most popular technique for preparing porous ceramics owing to its high efficiency, low cost, strong controllability of product structures, and excellent thermal insulation performance of products 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several techniques for preparing porous ceramics have been developed, such as organic foam impregnation 6 , freeze‐drying 7 , sol‐gel 8 , 3D printing, 9 and direct gel‐foaming 10 . Among the above methods, the direct gel‐foaming technology is regarded as the most popular technique for preparing porous ceramics owing to its high efficiency, low cost, strong controllability of product structures, and excellent thermal insulation performance of products 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%