2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-019-06685-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of potassium niobium sulfide and its selective adsorption properties for Sr2+ and Co2+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metal sulfides are newly emerging Cs + and Sr 2+ ion exchangers showing high adsorption capacity and a faster kinetic response, which is ascribed to their flexible frameworks and strong affinity of soft Lewis basic S 2– for Cs + or Sr 2+ ions. ,, In recent years, the metal sulfides with exchangeable alkaline metal ions (K + or Na + ions) have been reported as promising ion exchangers for Cs + and Sr 2+ ions. ,, , Protonated organic amine cation-directed metal sulfides with superior Cs + and Sr 2+ removal performances have also been reported. ,,,,,, However, systematic study of the removal of Cs + or Sr 2+ ions by metal sulfides under acidic conditions is still rare. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal sulfides are newly emerging Cs + and Sr 2+ ion exchangers showing high adsorption capacity and a faster kinetic response, which is ascribed to their flexible frameworks and strong affinity of soft Lewis basic S 2– for Cs + or Sr 2+ ions. ,, In recent years, the metal sulfides with exchangeable alkaline metal ions (K + or Na + ions) have been reported as promising ion exchangers for Cs + and Sr 2+ ions. ,, , Protonated organic amine cation-directed metal sulfides with superior Cs + and Sr 2+ removal performances have also been reported. ,,,,,, However, systematic study of the removal of Cs + or Sr 2+ ions by metal sulfides under acidic conditions is still rare. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weber–Morris model assumes that diffusion resistance only works within a short period of time when the adsorption reaction starts or even negligible. The diffusion direction of the adsorbent is random, and the diffusion coefficient is constant . Its equation is as follows: Q t = I W + K W t 1 / 2 where K W (mg·(g·h 1/2 ) −1 ) is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant and I W is the intercept for Weber–Morris models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffusion direction of the adsorbent is random, and the diffusion coefficient is constant. 43 Its equation is as follows: 44…”
Section: Effect Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the factors affecting the adsorption rate of MMIP and MNIP, the Boyd model to control the external diffusion rate and the Weber‐Morris model to control the internal diffusion rate were used to analyze the experimental results. The Boyd model assumes that the diffusion resistance mainly comes from the liquid film formed on the particle surface, and are calculated as following Eq (6) and 7: [37] Bnormalt=KnormalBt+InormalB $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr {\rm B}{_{{\rm t}}}={\rm K}{_{{\rm B}}}{\rm t}+{\rm I}{_{{\rm B}}}\hfill\cr}}$ Bnormalt=-0.4977-ln(1-normalqnormaltnormalqnormale) $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr {\rm B}{_{{\rm t}}}=- 0.4977- {\rm ln}\ (1- {{{{\rm q}}_{{\rm t}}}\over{{{\rm q}}_{{\rm e}}}})\hfill\cr}}$ …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] To investigate the factors affecting the adsorption rate of MMIP and MNIP, the Boyd model to control the external diffusion rate and the Weber-Morris model to control the internal diffusion rate were used to analyze the experimental results. The Boyd model assumes that the diffusion resistance mainly comes from the liquid film formed on the particle surface, and are calculated as following Eq (6) and ( 7): [37] B…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Time and Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%