1974
DOI: 10.1021/jf60191a028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of solutions for atomic absorption analyses of iron, manganese, zinc, and copper in plant tissue

Abstract: Dry ashing results in decreases in the apparent levels of Cu, Zn, and Fe in many types of plant tissue. The high concentrations of extraneous ions often present in plant ash solutions interfere with the determination of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu by atomic absorption. A procedure is proposed involving wet ashing with HNO3, HCIO4, and H2SO4 and complete extraction of the trace ele-ments with pyrrolidine dithiocarbamic acid in CHCI3. The CHCI3 is evaporated and the residue containing the trace elements is solubilized by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, colorless solutions were filtered with a Whatman no. 42 filter paper into 100-mL volumetric flasks and diluted [12].…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, colorless solutions were filtered with a Whatman no. 42 filter paper into 100-mL volumetric flasks and diluted [12].…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All fruit and wood samples were re-dried at 60°C for at least 3 h immediately before analysis. A 0.5 g sub-sample was weighed and prepared using the wet digestion technique of Baker and Smith (1974). The concentrations of B, Ca, K, Mg, and Zn were determined with an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrophotometer (ICPAES) model Spectroflame P (Spectro Analytical Instruments, Kleve, Germany).…”
Section: Percentage Dry Matter and Minerals Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isaac and Johnson (1975) and Smith and Schrenk (1972) found no difference between dry ashing and wet ashing for micronutrients in alfalfa, citrus, orchard, pecan, and tomato leaves, and in alfalfa, corn, sorghum, and wheat leaves, respectively. Baker and Smith (1974) also reported no differences for micronutrients in cabbage leaves but reported lower value for Cu in corn cob by dry ashing relative to wet ashing. Our experience has been that for nonleaf samples, such as dried strawberry fruit and wheat flour, lower recoveries occur for Cu by dry ashing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%