2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.544.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of the Ceramic Hollow Balls of Aluminium Titanate-Based by Rolling-Ball Method

Abstract: Aluminium titanate - based hollow balls were prepared by using aluminum titanate, mullite and magnesia aluminate spinel as starting materials followed by the rolling-ball method. The effect of different pore-making agents (namely the amylum, flour, millet and urea) on the forming properties and the apparent qualities of the precursors of the hollow balls were investigated. The results show that the precursors of the hollow balls own both good forming properties and apparent qualities when using the amylum as p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) When the ceramic beads are dense and without pores, the measured bulk density value of the ceramic beads will be close to the theoretical density value. From the literatures, the tested bulk density value of zirconia beads using the conventional rolling process is generally below 6.0 g/cm 3 [5][6][7][8], and the tested bulk density value of E Sample is 5.91 g/cm 3 . It can be seen in the literature that there are some defects and pores in the traditional rolling method, which leads to the density lower than the theoretical density [7].…”
Section: Bulk Density Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1) When the ceramic beads are dense and without pores, the measured bulk density value of the ceramic beads will be close to the theoretical density value. From the literatures, the tested bulk density value of zirconia beads using the conventional rolling process is generally below 6.0 g/cm 3 [5][6][7][8], and the tested bulk density value of E Sample is 5.91 g/cm 3 . It can be seen in the literature that there are some defects and pores in the traditional rolling method, which leads to the density lower than the theoretical density [7].…”
Section: Bulk Density Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literatures, the tested bulk density value of zirconia beads using the conventional rolling process is generally below 6.0 g/cm 3 [5][6][7][8], and the tested bulk density value of E Sample is 5.91 g/cm 3 . It can be seen in the literature that there are some defects and pores in the traditional rolling method, which leads to the density lower than the theoretical density [7]. The tested bulk density value of the A Sample prepared with the new method is 6.05 g/cm 3 , which is higher than E Sample.…”
Section: Bulk Density Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1)5) The conventional rolling process to prepare the zirconia, alumina, ZrO 2 Al 2 O 3 composite beads is by grinding zirconia and alumina powder, granulating and rolling them to form beads, then obtain beads by sintering at high temperature. 6), 7) The main defects of the beads prepared by this method are containing many pores, large size of grains, low crushing load and small hardness characteristics, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%