1966
DOI: 10.1159/000229700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparations of Purified Antigens from Staphylococcus Aureus in Biologic and Serologic Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, such sera also yielded positive results in the PHT, their titers ranging up to 1: 81,920. On the other hand, as reported by others (4,20), individual sera from rabbits, including those used for immunization, were completely negative to protein A in the ADT. The same was true with respect to the PHT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, such sera also yielded positive results in the PHT, their titers ranging up to 1: 81,920. On the other hand, as reported by others (4,20), individual sera from rabbits, including those used for immunization, were completely negative to protein A in the ADT. The same was true with respect to the PHT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In addition the tissue reactions could not be related to histamine or histamine like compounds in the challenging staphylococcal material used [ 18-231 . Jensen [24] and later L6fkvist [25] found that an extracted product from S. aureus, antigen A, contracted normal guinea pig ileum. Liifkvist and Sjoquist showed that this antigen preparation contained a protein [26] which was called protein A. Lofkvist suggested [25] that protein A may have been the active agent in the preparations of Dworetzky et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition the tissue reactions could not be related to histamine or histamine like compounds in the challenging staphylococcal material used [ 18-231 . Jensen [24] and later L6fkvist [25] found that an extracted product from S. aureus, antigen A, contracted normal guinea pig ileum. Liifkvist and Sjoquist showed that this antigen preparation contained a protein [26] which was called protein A. Lofkvist suggested [25] that protein A may have been the active agent in the preparations of Dworetzky et al [20-231. The anaphylatic reactions in non-immunized guinea pigs [2] and the Arthus reaction in rabbits [3] elicited by protein A are believed to to depend on conformational changes of IgG resulting from the reaction of the Fc portion with protein A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein A from Staphylococctis aureus reacts myeloma protein (3) to acid has been shown with normal human IgG (U) and with IgG to render the region between CH2 and CH3 from a number of animal species (7,10,16, susceptible to proteolysis. In the latter case, 18,20). This interaction is not with the an-trypsin was used in the isolation of distinct tigen-binding sites of the Fab regions but with components corresponding antigenically to the the Fc regions of the IgG molecules (5-8, 10, CH2 and CH3 regions, and the CH2 fragment [13][14][15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%