Sexual Offender Treatment 2005
DOI: 10.1002/9780470713457.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparatory Programs for Sexual Offenders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be more likely achieved through treatment delivery modalities that actively engage participants as opposed to merely increasing the threshold at which they are discharged. There is a growing body of literature informing clinical methods to address offender resistance and responsiveness before (Mann, Webster, Wakeling, & Keylock, 2013; Marshall, Marshall, Fernandez, Malcolm, & Moulden, 2008; Sheehan & Ware, 2012) and during treatment (for a recent review, see Holdsworth et al, 2014). Therapeutic process factors are likely to become increasingly critical to treatment success as changing operational performance policies relating to attrition influence target sample demographics by promoting the retention of more resistant, disruptive, or antisocial offenders in programs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be more likely achieved through treatment delivery modalities that actively engage participants as opposed to merely increasing the threshold at which they are discharged. There is a growing body of literature informing clinical methods to address offender resistance and responsiveness before (Mann, Webster, Wakeling, & Keylock, 2013; Marshall, Marshall, Fernandez, Malcolm, & Moulden, 2008; Sheehan & Ware, 2012) and during treatment (for a recent review, see Holdsworth et al, 2014). Therapeutic process factors are likely to become increasingly critical to treatment success as changing operational performance policies relating to attrition influence target sample demographics by promoting the retention of more resistant, disruptive, or antisocial offenders in programs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%