Preparedness, impacts, and responses of public health emergencies towards health security: qualitative synthesis of evidence

Abstract

Background Natural and human-made public health emergencies (PHEs), such as armed conflicts, floods, and disease outbreaks, influence health systems including interruption of delivery and utilization of health services, and increased health service needs. However, the intensity and types of impacts of these PHEs vary across countries due to several associated factors. This scoping review aimed to synthesise available evidence on PHEs, their preparedness, impacts, and responses. Methods We conducted a scoping review of published evidence. Studies were identified using search terms related to two concepts: health security and primary health care. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to select studies. We adapted the review framework of Arksey and O’Malley. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach and explained under three stages of PHEs: preparedness, impacts, and responses. Results A total of 64 studies were included in this review. Health systems of many low- and middle-income countries had inadequate preparedness to absorb the shocks of PHEs, limited surveillance, and monitoring of risks. Health systems have been overburdened with interrupted health services, increased need for health services, poor health resilience, and health inequities. Strategies of response to the impact of PHEs included integrated services such as public health and primary care, communication and partnership across sectors, use of digital tools, multisectoral coordination and actions, system approach to responses, multidisciplinary providers, and planning for resilient health systems. Conclusions Public health emergencies have high impacts in countries with weak health systems, inadequate preparedness, and inadequate surveillance mechanisms. Better health system preparedness is required to absorb the impact, respond to the consequences, and adapt for future PHEs. Some potential response strategies could be ensuring need-based health services, monitoring and surveillance of post-emergency outbreaks, and multisectoral actions to engage sectors to address the collateral impacts of PHEs. Mitigation strategies for future PHEs could include risk assessment, disaster preparedness, and setting digital alarm systems for monitoring and surveillance.

Identification, analysis and prediction of valid and false information related to vaccines from Romanian tweets

“…Indeed, it was already emphasized that the spread of vaccine misinformation is partly correlated with hate speech and aggressive language ( 41 ). Moreover, the fact that a significant part of pandemic and vaccine misinformation was politically driven ( 6 ) warrants better communication campaigns and public health strategies which must address vaccine hesitancy and national and global action plans during health crises ( 42 ). This need maybe even more pronounced in countries such as Romania, where the level of Covid vaccination was significantly lower than the level reached in Western European countries ( 22 ).…”

Assessing disaster preparedness of emergency nurses in Saudi Arabia: A study on educational needs

“…Since 1980, 56 disasters have occurred in Saudi Arabia, resulting in approximately 4,700 fatalities, 34,000 injuries, and damages amounting to USD 1.87 billion. These events have highlighted the significant challenges faced by Saudi hospitals in disaster management and underscore the necessity for healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, to be wellprepared to mitigate adverse effects on healthcare outcomes (Khatri et al, 2023).…”

“…Despite the fundamental inclusion of disaster preparation in nursing education, there is a significant gap in the practical knowledge and exposure of nurses to emergency response scenarios. Studies have shown that many nurses lack the required proficiency and confidence in handling emergency situations effectively (Khatri et al, 2023).…”