“…The conceptualization of fraud and fraud risks is articulated within narrow limits concerning the type and range of responses reasonably appropriate by standard setters (Camfferman & Wielhouwer, 2019; Dorminey et al, 2012; Nieschwietz et al, 2000; Power, 2013). These limits focus reform efforts on internal and audit controls designed around individuals’ moral defects and the internal control weaknesses of the organizations (Davis & Pesch, 2013; Dilla & Raschke, 2015; Gabbioneta et al, 2013 ; McVay & Szerwo, 2021; Morales et al, 2014; Wilks & Zimbelman, 2004). The outcome is that fraud is seen as a by-product of the risks inherent in a well-functioning system that can be addressed with audit analytics strategies as the normal treatment of reform (Fulop et al, 2019; Neu, Everett, Rahaman, & Martinez, 2013; Norman et al, 2010; Ramamoorti, 2008).…”