Preparing for audit and feedback: practical considerations

Khalid, Ahmad Firas; Grimshaw, Jeremy

doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000330

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While this study may be regarded as a milestone in the implementation of CBR in mental health, it is crucial to focus on the voices of the communities to facilitate implementation. 52 This can be seen as the next step in the research process. To achieve this, participatory action research must be considered in the development of implementation strategies involving health care professionals and individuals with mental disorders.…”

Section: Original Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building an implementation strategy for community-based rehabilitation for mental health in Colombia

Agudelo-Hernández,

Rojas-Andrade,

Giraldo Alvarez

2024

JBI Evidence Implementation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Scientific evidence indicates that the community-based rehabilitation (CBR) model is recommended for recovery from mental disorders. However, this approach encounters barriers and often lacks implementation strategies. Aim: The aim of this study is to create a strategy for the implementation of CBR for mental health in Colombia through the identification of barriers and facilitators, together with the expected outcomes, from the perspective of mental health decision-makers in Colombia. Methods: This study adopts a qualitative descriptive approach, using focus group data collection methods and thematic analysis to code and analyze the data. Results: A total of 208 individuals participated in the study, including mental health decision-makers and health care professionals. Intersectoral collaboration, contextualization, financial resources, and community commitment and autonomy were identified as barriers and facilitators. The element that was considered a priority for successful implementation was the contextualization of strategies. Conclusions: CBR needs to be strengthened through implementation science if these strategies are to be successfully developed and implemented in various contexts. Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A210

show abstract

Section: Original Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building an implementation strategy for community-based rehabilitation for mental health in Colombia

Agudelo-Hernández,

Rojas-Andrade,

Giraldo Alvarez

2024

JBI Evidence Implementation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2 Audit and feedback as a change process informed by the JBI Model, demonstrates the relationship between healthcare needs, types of evidence, methods of synthesis and transfer, and how these drive implementation. 3 The model is widely cited in implementation studies, emphasizing that evidence-based practice change involves access to synthesized evidence, rather than reliance on single studies. It also shows users how transfer mechanisms support implementation planning by building knowledge, capacity, and expertise through hands-on education, training, skill, and knowledge transfer.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The JBI Model of EBHC (evidence-based healthcare) is a global point of reference for best practice 2 . Audit and feedback as a change process informed by the JBI Model, demonstrates the relationship between healthcare needs, types of evidence, methods of synthesis and transfer, and how these drive implementation 3 . The model is widely cited in implementation studies, emphasizing that evidence-based practice change involves access to synthesized evidence, rather than reliance on single studies.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Making implementation work

Lockwood

2023

JBI Evidence Implementation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Audit and Feedback in the Hospitals of the Emergency Networks in the Lazio Region, Italy: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the State of Implementation

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Audit and Feedback (A&F) is an effective multidimensional strategy for improving the quality of care. The optimal methods for its implementation remain unclear. This study aimed to map the state of art of A&F strategies in the hospitals involved in a time-dependent emergency network. For these purposes, a structured questionnaire was defined and discussed within the research group. This consists of 29 questions in three sections: (1) characteristics of the structure, (2) internal feedback systems, and (3) external feedback systems. All structures involved in the network were invited to participate in the e-survey by indicating a Health Management representative and a clinical representative for the Cardiovascular (CaV) and/or for the Cerebrovascular area (CeV). Of 20 structures invited, a total of 13 (65%) responded to the survey, 11 for the CaV area and 8 for the CeV area. A total of 10 of 11 (91%) facilities for the CaV area and 8/11 (75%) for the CeV area reported that they perform A&F activities. All facilities perform at least one of the activities defined as “assimilating A&F procedures.” The most frequent is the presentation and discussion of clinical cases (82% CaV and 88% CeV) and the least is the identification of responsible for improvement actions (45% CaV and 38% CeV). In 4/10 (40%) facilities for the CaV area and 4/8 (50%) for the CEV area, corrective actions are suggested or planned when the feedback is returned. These results confirm the need to define, in a synergistic way with the relevant stakeholders, an effective and agreed A&F intervention to improve the level of implementation of A&F strategies.

show abstract

Preparing for audit and feedback: practical considerations

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Building an implementation strategy for community-based rehabilitation for mental health in Colombia

Building an implementation strategy for community-based rehabilitation for mental health in Colombia

Making implementation work

Audit and Feedback in the Hospitals of the Emergency Networks in the Lazio Region, Italy: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the State of Implementation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About