2010
DOI: 10.2202/1949-6605.6087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing for Fiscal Leadership in Student Affairs: The Senior Student Affairs Officer Voice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anti-Blackness rhetoric is multifaceted as the rhetoric used can harm Black people’s ways of being and enact white supremacy (Dancy et al, 2018; Stewart, 2019). Instances of anti-Blackness often hide within the rhetoric of inclusion, which can go unexamined and unchecked, excluding and targeting Black people through ideologies of absence (Stewart, 2019). Further, anti-Blackness has been known to be embedded into institutional leaders’ responses to racialized incidents.…”
Section: Institutional Responses To Racialized Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-Blackness rhetoric is multifaceted as the rhetoric used can harm Black people’s ways of being and enact white supremacy (Dancy et al, 2018; Stewart, 2019). Instances of anti-Blackness often hide within the rhetoric of inclusion, which can go unexamined and unchecked, excluding and targeting Black people through ideologies of absence (Stewart, 2019). Further, anti-Blackness has been known to be embedded into institutional leaders’ responses to racialized incidents.…”
Section: Institutional Responses To Racialized Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, students have worked to ensure that their experiences were represented and supported in the cultural, academic, and social experiences of the university (Ferguson, 2012; Patton, 2011; Rojas, 2007). However, despite reductive claims that universities are responsive to the ongoing needs of diverse student, staff, and faculty populations (Ahmed, 2012), and that affinity-based centers are safe havens for those with marginalized identities (Campus Pride Index, 2020), reports of anti-Blackness (e.g., Stewart, 2019), homophobia (Renn, 2011), and transphobia (e.g., Beemyn et al, 2005) persist. These instances continue to proliferate across time, region, and institutional type, suggesting a presence of racist, homophobic, and transphobic discourses that frame college life (Blockett, 2017; Jourian, 2017; Marine, 2011; Mobley & Johnson, 2019; Nicolazzo, 2016b, 2017a, 2017b; Patton, 2014, 2016; Simmons, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we draw upon a growing body of literature that illuminates invisibility and hypervisibility. Invisibility can be defined as "being treated as if one is not visible, and being dismissed, devalued, ignored, and delegitimized by others because of one's race" (Torres-Harding et al, 2012, p. 155-156 ) or due to membership in a social identity group with limited representation (Stewart, 2018-19). Ironically, while those holding marginalized identities often experience feeling voiceless and invisible, they often also experience feeling highly scrutinized or hypervisible.…”
Section: Invisibility and Hypervisibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ironically, while those holding marginalized identities often experience feeling voiceless and invisible, they often also experience feeling highly scrutinized or hypervisible. Hypervisibility is the "condition of being subject to heightened scrutiny, observations, and policing due to one's limited representation" (Stewart, 2018-19). Ryland (2013) further described hypervisibility as "scrutiny based on perceived difference, often (mis) recognized as deviance" (p. 222).…”
Section: Invisibility and Hypervisibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%