2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing for the unknown: How working memory provides a link between perception and anticipated action

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the overall amplitudes in the response-locked ERLs appeared to be larger. This observation is consistent with previous work in the visual domain, illustrating that the SPCN co-varies with response time (Schneider et al, 2014) and in a broader context, also corroborates the newly emerging perspective on working memory that emphasizes its role for guiding actions (Heuer et al, 2020; Rösner et al, 2022; Schneider et al, 2017; van Ede, 2020). The response-locked analysis further revealed an additional cluster related to larger SACN amplitudes in the audiovisual-congruent compared to the auditory-only condition shortly before response onset.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Accordingly, the overall amplitudes in the response-locked ERLs appeared to be larger. This observation is consistent with previous work in the visual domain, illustrating that the SPCN co-varies with response time (Schneider et al, 2014) and in a broader context, also corroborates the newly emerging perspective on working memory that emphasizes its role for guiding actions (Heuer et al, 2020; Rösner et al, 2022; Schneider et al, 2017; van Ede, 2020). The response-locked analysis further revealed an additional cluster related to larger SACN amplitudes in the audiovisual-congruent compared to the auditory-only condition shortly before response onset.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This pattern of action encoding -or "output planning at the input stage" -occurred even in the face of an intervening task and predicted performance several seconds later (Boettcher et al, 2021). We build upon this finding, and upon complementary recent findings demonstrating manual action planning alongside visual working memory (Ester & Weese, 2022;Henderson et al, 2022;Nasrawi & van Ede, 2022;Rösner et al, 2022;Schneider et al, 2017;van Ede et al, 2019). Specifically, we address three important questions left unaddressed by previous research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…First, we show that action planning -as reflected by the pattern of action encoding during the memory delay -truly reflects the early prospection of a future required task, as it flexibly adapts to different visual-motor mappings. Similar to previous studies (Boettcher et al, 2021;Henderson et al, 2022;Rösner et al, 2022;Schneider et al, 2017;van Ede et al, 2019), we linked visual tilt (left-or rightward) to specific manual responses. Critically, however, in the current study we additionally varied the mapping between tilt and response hand, such that any specific tilt required reproduction with a left hand in some blocks, and with the right hand in other blocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, even if effects of salience on attentional processes and eye movements are short-lived, their repercussions at later processing stages, such as VWM, might affect behavior much more deeply than would be expected based on the findings from the attention community alone. In fact, VWM is considered the major cognitive bottleneck of visual processing with effects on even later stages such as object recognition, long-term memory formation, and action control (Liesefeld et al, 2020; Liesefeld & Müller, 2019; Rösner et al, 2022; van Ede & Nobre, 2023), so that any effect on VWM processing has strong implications for many cognitive functions and applied settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%