2016
DOI: 10.1177/0162643416660834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing Special Educators for the K–12 Online Learning Environment

Abstract: Pioneering research studies in teacher preparation in online settings have taken place, yet little to no work has been done specifically focused on teacher preparation for special education and learners with disabilities. In the present study, researchers from the Center on Online Learning and Students with Disabilities conducted a web-based survey of special education teacher preparation faculty to determine the level to which they were attending to online education preparation. The survey was developed with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second section included six open-ended questions focused on the research topics. These questions were identified on the basis of a number of studies, especially the iNACOL's National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, as used in Smith et al (2016a); Alamri and Tyler-Wood (2016) developed a research instrument focused on how to facilitate and support social and teaching presence; the study of Straub and Vasquez (2015) was the key reference for online writing instructions; and Hanghøj et al (2018) focused their research on the topics related to well-being, engagement and performance of students with special needs. The resulting questionnaire was completed by 785 teachers from schools located in the Genoa region of northern Italy.…”
Section: Instruments Procedures and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second section included six open-ended questions focused on the research topics. These questions were identified on the basis of a number of studies, especially the iNACOL's National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, as used in Smith et al (2016a); Alamri and Tyler-Wood (2016) developed a research instrument focused on how to facilitate and support social and teaching presence; the study of Straub and Vasquez (2015) was the key reference for online writing instructions; and Hanghøj et al (2018) focused their research on the topics related to well-being, engagement and performance of students with special needs. The resulting questionnaire was completed by 785 teachers from schools located in the Genoa region of northern Italy.…”
Section: Instruments Procedures and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how teachers implemented e-inclusion during the school closure to enable inclusive online teaching/ learning strategies, emphasising the interaction between digital tools, contexts, pupils, families and teachers to prevent the digital divide from increasing the difficulties of pupils with SEND (Selwyn & Facer, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that special issue, the Principal Investigators and other colleagues from the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) funded Center on Online Learning and Students with Disabilities (http://www.centerononlinelearning.res.ku.edu) provided empirical evidence from studies detailing methods and results for students with disabilities in online learning. Topics included an introduction to personalized learning using online learning options (Basham et al, 2016a), providing accommodations and modifications in the online environment (Carter & Rice, 2016), aligning UDL design principles to various offerings within the online learning environment (Basham et al, 2016b), design and delivery of online reading instruction (Pace & Mellard, 2016), and implications for teacher preparation and online learning (Smith et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Online Learning Is Not Newmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quick scan of the existing literature reveals very few research studies in the field of on learning for younger children, and a majority of the studies took the perspectives of the instructors and the online program service providers (Huh & Reigeluth, 2018; Luo, Hibbard, Franklin, & Moore, 2017; Smith, Basham, Rice, & Carter Jr, 2016). There lack studies that explore the virtual settings and the appropriate pedagogical designs to effectively engage K‐12 school students, especially the students of lower grades, while also addressing their cognitive, social–emotional needs under self‐quarantine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%